ArticleScientific reports2022
Analysis of flow rate and pressure in syringe-based wound irrigation using Bernoulli's equation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of a Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Mobile Education Program on Syringe-Based Wound Irrigation.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Development and usability evaluation of training equipment for syringe-based wound irrigation education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Liquid-Driven Microinjection System for Precise Fundus Injection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Analysis of flow rate of continuous bladder irrigation according to the height of the irrigation infusion set.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the dependence of the pressure level in the wound area on the height of the syringe needle from the wound, the gauge of the needle, and the flow rate using the Bernoulli equation. This study was the control-volume analysis using the Bernoulli equation. At a given height of the syringe needle from the wound, the gauge of the syringe needle was fixed, and the pressure in the wound area, which depended on the flow rate of the irrigation solution discharged from the tip of the needle, was calculated according to the Bernoulli equation and the definition of the flow rate. At a constant flow rate of the irrigation solution, the velocity of the irrigation solution discharged through the syringe needle decreased (7.80 → 0.80) with an increase in the diameter of the needle (18G → 14G). At a constant inner diameter of the needle, the velocity of the irrigation solution increased with a reduction in the flow rate of the solution. As the velocity of the irrigation solution increased, the pressure in the wound area increased. As the height of the syringe needle from the wound area increased, the pressure in the wound area increased. In order to maintain the pressure of 8-15 psi when nurses perform syringe-based irrigation, it is necessary to set the flow rate of the cleaning solution from 3.5 cc/s to less than 4.8 cc/s for 19G. In addition, 20G maintains the flow rate of the solution at 2.6 cc/s or more and less than 3.5 cc/s, 22G maintains the flow rate of solution at 1.3 cc/s or more and less than 1.8 cc/s, and 25G maintains the flow rate of solution at 0.5 cc/s. This study provides nurses with a reference for the flow rate at which syringe-based irrigation can be performed while maintaining the appropriate pressure based on fluid dynamics, which can be used as the basis for wound nursing standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.