Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056131›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A flexible MRI coil based on a cable conductor and applied to knee imaging.

Bili Wang, Syed S Siddiq, Jerzy Walczyk, Mary Bruno, Iman Khodarahmi, Inge M Brinkmann, Robert Rehner, Karthik Lakshmanan, Jan Fritz, Ryan Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reconfigurable animal bed-EPR resonator assembly for multimodal co-registration.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2026
    Article
  4. Adaptable, wearable, and stretchable coils: A review.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dual-Tuned Coaxial-Transmission-Line RF Coils for HyperpolarizedIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bili WangDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Syed S SiddiqDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Jerzy WalczykDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Mary BrunoDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Iman KhodarahmiDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Inge M BrinkmannSiemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Malvern, PA, USA.
Robert RehnerSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
Karthik LakshmananDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Jan FritzDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, USA.
Ryan BrownDepartment of Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, USA. ryan.brown@nyulangone.org.
New York University · USSiemens Healthcare (Germany) · DE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Christopher M Collins · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Reversing Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Through ExerciseR01DK114428 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BROWN, RYAN, RAO, SMITA · 2018 to 2020
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK114428NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIH HHS R01 DK114428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flexible radiofrequency coils for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have garnered attention in research and industrial communities because they provide improved accessibility and performance and can accommodate a range of anatomic postures. Most recent flexible coil developments involve customized conductors or substrate materials and/or target applications at 3 T or above. In contrast, we set out to design a flexible coil based on an off-the-shelf conductor that is suitable for operation at 0.55 T (23.55 MHz). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) degradation can occur in such an environment because the resistance of the coil conductor can be significant with respect to the sample. We found that resonating a commercially available RG-223 coaxial cable shield with a lumped capacitor while the inner conductor remained electrically floating gave rise to a highly effective "cable coil." A 10-cm diameter cable coil was flexible enough to wrap around the knee, an application that can benefit from flexible coils, and had similar conductor loss and SNR as a standard-of-reference rigid copper coil. A two-channel cable coil array also provided good SNR robustness against geometric variability, outperforming a two-channel coaxial coil array by 26 and 16% when the elements were overlapped by 20-40% or gapped by 30-50%, respectively. A 6-channel cable coil array was constructed for 0.55 T knee imaging. Incidental cartilage and bone pathologies were clearly delineated in T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin echo images acquired in 3-4 min with the proposed coil, suggesting that clinical quality knee imaging is feasible in an acceptable examination timeframe. Correcting for T1, the SNR measured with the cable coil was approximately threefold lower than that measured with a 1.5 T state-of-the-art 18-channel coil, which is expected given the threefold difference in main magnetic field strength. This result suggests that the 0.55 T cable coil conductor loss does not deleteriously impact SNR, which might be anticipated at low field.

Indexed as

Knee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingEquipment DesignPhantoms, ImagingRadio WavesSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID36056131
PMCPMC9440226
OpenAlexW4294266718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.