Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056115›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Cloud-enabled Biodepot workflow builder integrates image processing using Fiji with reproducible data analysis using Jupyter notebooks.

Ling-Hong Hung, Evan Straw, Shishir Reddy, Robert Schmitz, Zachary Colburn, Ka Yee Yeung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ling-Hong HungSchool of Engineering and Technology, University of Washington Tacoma, Box 358426, Tacoma, 98402, WA, USA.
Evan StrawBiodepot LLC, Seattle, 98195, WA, USA.
Shishir ReddySchool of Engineering and Technology, University of Washington Tacoma, Box 358426, Tacoma, 98402, WA, USA.
Robert SchmitzSchool of Engineering and Technology, University of Washington Tacoma, Box 358426, Tacoma, 98402, WA, USA.
Zachary ColburnBiodepot LLC, Seattle, 98195, WA, USA.
Ka Yee YeungSchool of Engineering and Technology, University of Washington Tacoma, Box 358426, Tacoma, 98402, WA, USA. kayee@uw.edu.

Funding

Intelligent deployment of containerized bioinformatics workflows on the cloudR01GM126019 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI YEUNG-RHEE, KA YEE · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
"HIGH THROUGHPUT SPATIALOMICS PROFILING FOR THICK TUMOR TISSUES"75N91021C00022 · NCI · BIODEPOT LLC · PI HOANG, VARIK · 2021 to 2021
$399k
SBIR Phase I Topic 407 - Cloud-Based Software for the Cancer Research Data Commons. 75N91020C00009 · NCI · BIODEPOT LLC · PI HUNG, LING-HONG · 2020 to 2020
$246k
NCI NIH HHS 75N91020C00009NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM126019NIH HHS 75N91021C00022NIH HHS R01GM126019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern biomedical image analyses workflows contain multiple computational processing tasks giving rise to problems in reproducibility. In addition, image datasets can span both spatial and temporal dimensions, with additional channels for fluorescence and other data, resulting in datasets that are too large to be processed locally on a laptop. For omics analyses, software containers have been shown to enhance reproducibility, facilitate installation and provide access to scalable computational resources on the cloud. However, most image analyses contain steps that are graphical and interactive, features that are not supported by most omics execution engines. We present the containerized and cloud-enabled Biodepot-workflow-builder platform that supports graphics from software containers and has been extended for image analyses. We demonstrate the potential of our modular approach with multi-step workflows that incorporate the popular and open-source Fiji suite for image processing. One of our examples integrates fully interactive ImageJ macros with Jupyter notebooks. Our second example illustrates how the complicated cloud setup of an computationally intensive process such as stitching 3D digital pathology datasets using BigStitcher can be automated and simplified. In both examples, users can leverage a form-based graphical interface to execute multi-step workflows with a single click, using the provided sample data and preset input parameters. Alternatively, users can interactively modify the image processing steps in the workflow, apply the workflows to their own data, change the input parameters and macros. By providing interactive graphics support to software containers, our modular platform supports reproducible image analysis workflows, simplified access to cloud resources for analysis of large datasets, and integration across different applications such as Jupyter.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisSoftwareComputational BiologyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID36056115
PMCPMC9440253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.