Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056104›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Multiproxy study of 7500-year-old wooden sickles from the Lakeshore Village of La Marmotta, Italy.

Niccolò Mazzucco, Mario Mineo, Daniele Arobba, Rosanna Caramiello, Laura Caruso Fermé, Bernard Gassin, Denis Guilbeau, Juan José Ibáñez, Lionello F Morandi, Millán Mozota and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Niccolò MazzuccoDipartimento di Civiltà e Forme del Sapere, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy. niccolo.mazzucco@unipi.it.
Mario MineoMuseo Delle Civiltà (MuCiv), Rome, Italy.
Daniele ArobbaMuseo Archeologico del Finale, Istituto Internazionale di Studi Liguri, Bordighera, Italy.
Rosanna CaramielloDipartimento di Scienza Della Vita e Biologia dei Sistemi, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Laura Caruso FerméInstituto Patagónico de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas (IPCSH-CONICET), Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
Bernard GassinTravaux et Recherches Archéologiques sur les Cultures, Les Espaces et les Sociétés (TRACES) UMR 5608 CNRS, Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France.
Denis GuilbeauMinistry of Culture/Archéologie des Sociétés Méditerranéennes (ASM) UMR 5140 CNRS, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier III, Montpellier, France.
Juan José IbáñezArchaeology of Social Dynamics, Institución Milá y Fontanals de Investigación en Humanidades (IMF-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Lionello F MorandiCompetence Center Archaeometry Baden-Württemberg, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Millán MozotaInstitución Milá y Fontanals de Investigación en Humanidades (IMF-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Fiona PichonArchaeology of Social Dynamics, Institución Milá y Fontanals de Investigación en Humanidades (IMF-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Marta PortilloArchaeology of Social Dynamics, Institución Milá y Fontanals de Investigación en Humanidades (IMF-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
Maxime RageotDepartment of Pre- and Protohistory, University of Tübingen and Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Gerard RemolinsUniversità di Bari, CNR-ISPC, Valencia, Spain.
Mauro RottoliLaboratorio di Archeobiologia dei Musei Civici di Como, Como, Italy.
Juan F GibajaEscuela Española de Historia y Arqueología en Roma, EEHAR-CSIC, Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lakeshore site of La Marmotta is one of the most important Early Neolithic sites of Mediterranean Europe. The site is famous for the exceptional preservation of organic materials, including numerous wooden artefacts related to navigation, agriculture, textile production, and basketry. This article presents interdisciplinary research on three of the most complete and well-preserved sickles recovered from the site, yet unpublished. All the components of the tools are analysed: the stone inserts, the wooden haft and the adhesive substances used to fix the stones inside the haft. Our innovative methodology combines use-wear and microtexture analysis of stone tools through confocal microscopy, taxonomical and technological analysis of wood, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of the adhesive substances, and pollen, non-pollen palynomorphs, and phytolith analysis of the remains incorporated within the adhesive. This multiproxy approach provides a significant insight into the life of these tools, from their production to their use and abandonment, providing evidence of the species of harvested plants and the conditions of the field during the harvesting.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellTechnologyAdhesivesAgricultureItalyWoodAdhesives

Identifiers

PMID36056104
PMCPMC9440057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.