Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36055281›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023

[Perspective Paper "Future Prevention Research" - Current and Future Coordinated Research on Prevention and Health Promotion].

Hajo Zeeb, Mirko Brandes, Ullrich Bauer, Sarah Forberger, Peter Gelius, Saskia Muellmann, Orkan Okan, Klaus Pfeifer, Britta Renner, Michael Wright

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Strengthening prevention and health promotion in and for old age].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hajo ZeebAbteilung Prävention und Evaluation, Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Mirko BrandesAbteilung Prävention und Evaluation, Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Ullrich BauerFakultät für Erziehungswissenschaft, Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gesundheitskompetenzforschung (IZGK), Zentrum für Prävention und Intervention im Kindes- und Jugendalter (ZPI), Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Sarah ForbergerAbteilung Prävention und Evaluation, Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Peter GeliusInstitut für Sportwissenschaft und Sport, Lehrstuhl Bewegung und Gesundheit, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Saskia MuellmannAbteilung Prävention und Evaluation, Leibniz-Institut für Präventionsforschung und Epidemiologie - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Orkan OkanFakultät für Sport- und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
Klaus PfeiferInstitut für Sportwissenschaft und Sport, Lehrstuhl Bewegung und Gesundheit, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Britta RennerFachbereich Psychologie, AG Psychologische Diagnostik und Gesundheitspsychologie, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Michael WrightInstitut für Soziale Gesundheit, Katholische Hochschule fur Sozialwesen Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEBielefeld University · DECatholic University of Applied Social Sciences · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From 2014 to 2022, the BMBF has funded five research networks in prevention research and health promotion that are also jointly coordinated (Research Network Primary Prevention and Health Promotion, www.fp2g.net). The researchers have produced a large number of relevant research outputs with insights gained into essential aspects of prevention research and health promotion. The networks research focused on basic principles, application-relevant findings, and implementation conditions of long-term prevention and health promotion for non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The constraints imposed by the pandemic from 2020 onwards were partly addressed by integrating Corona-related research and transfer activities. The importance of resilience for dealing with multiple health and social challenges got increased attention and was analyzed and discussed during the pandemic. For prevention research, research questions such as how to better implement prevention measures through digital tools are gaining additional importance. Together, the research networks have presented achievements and desiderata for future research. This perspective paper with its nine theses formulated in conclusion is intended as a stimulus for discussion among funders as well as the communty of researchers on the subject of successful prevention and health promotion. It is explicitly part of the continuity of the memoranda on prevention research developed in 2012.

Indexed as

Health PromotionHealth Services ResearchGermanyPandemics

Identifiers

PMID36055281
PMCPMC10155309
OpenAlexW4294542986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.