ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography
Volumetric Pancreas Segmentation on Computed Tomography: Accuracy and Efficiency of a Convolutional Neural Network Versus Manual Segmentation in 3D Slicer in the Context of Interreader Variability of Expert Radiologists.
Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Pooled it
- Bounding box-based 3D AI model for user-guided volumetric segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on standard-of-care CTs.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2023Trial
- Article
- AI-Driven insights in pancreatic cancer imaging: from pre-diagnostic detection to prognostication.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Intra-Individual Reproducibility of Automated Abdominal Organ Segmentation-Performance of TotalSegmentator Compared to Human Readers and an Independent nnU-Net Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Pancreas segmentation using AI developed on the largest CT dataset with multi-institutional validation and implications for early cancer detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancements in early detection of pancreatic cancer: the role of artificial intelligence and novel imaging techniques.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence applied in identifying left ventricular walls in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy images: Pilot study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Imaging for Early Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Updates and Challenges in the Implementation of Screening and Surveillance Programs.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024Review
- Assessing the robustness of a machine-learning model for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA): evaluating resilience to variations in image acquisition and radiomics workflow using image perturbation methods.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare accuracy and efficiency of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-enhanced workflow for pancreas segmentation versus radiologists in the context of interreader reliability.
methodsVolumetric pancreas segmentations on a data set of 294 portal venous computed tomographies were performed by 3 radiologists (R1, R2, and R3) and by a CNN. Convolutional neural network segmentations were reviewed and, if needed, corrected ("corrected CNN [c-CNN]" segmentations) by radiologists. Ground truth was obtained from radiologists' manual segmentations using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation algorithm. Interreader reliability and model's accuracy were evaluated with Dice-Sorenson coefficient (DSC) and Jaccard coefficient (JC). Equivalence was determined using a two 1-sided test. Convolutional neural network segmentations below the 25th percentile DSC were reviewed to evaluate segmentation errors. Time for manual segmentation and c-CNN was compared.
resultsPancreas volumes from 3 sets of segmentations (manual, CNN, and c-CNN) were noninferior to simultaneous truth and performance level estimation-derived volumes [76.6 cm 3 (20.2 cm 3 ), P < 0.05]. Interreader reliability was high (mean [SD] DSC between R2-R1, 0.87 [0.04]; R3-R1, 0.90 [0.05]; R2-R3, 0.87 [0.04]). Convolutional neural network segmentations were highly accurate (DSC, 0.88 [0.05]; JC, 0.79 [0.07]) and required minimal-to-no corrections (c-CNN: DSC, 0.89 [0.04]; JC, 0.81 [0.06]; equivalence, P < 0.05). Undersegmentation (n = 47 [64%]) was common in the 73 CNN segmentations below 25th percentile DSC, but there were no major errors. Total inference time (minutes) for CNN was 1.2 (0.3). Average time (minutes) taken by radiologists for c-CNN (0.6 [0.97]) was substantially lower compared with manual segmentation (3.37 [1.47]; savings of 77.9%-87% [ P < 0.0001]).
conclusionsConvolutional neural network-enhanced workflow provides high accuracy and efficiency for volumetric pancreas segmentation on computed tomography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.