Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36055049›Full record

ArticleESMO open2022

Methylation subgroup and molecular heterogeneity is a hallmark of glioblastoma: implications for biopsy targeting, classification and therapy.

J Gempt, F Withake, A K Aftahy, H S Meyer, M Barz, C Delbridge, F Liesche-Starnecker, G Prokop, N Pfarr, J Schlegel and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gliomas: Assessment of Preanalytical Variables.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2024
    Article
  9. Resolving spatial response heterogeneity in glioblastoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

J GemptDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
F WithakeDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
A K AftahyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
H S MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
M BarzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
C DelbridgeDepartments of Neuropathology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
F Liesche-StarneckerDepartments of Neuropathology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
G ProkopDepartments of Neuropathology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
N PfarrDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
J SchlegelDepartments of Neuropathology, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
B MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
C ZimmerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
B H MenzeDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
B WiestlerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany; TranslaTUM, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: b.wiestler@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntratumoral heterogeneity at the cellular and molecular level is a hallmark of glioblastoma (GB) that contributes to treatment resistance and poor clinical outcome. Little is known regarding epigenetic heterogeneity and intratumoral phylogeny and their implication for molecular classification and targeted therapies. PATIENTS AND

methodsMultiple tissue biopsies (238 in total) were sampled from 56 newly-diagnosed, treatment-naive GB patients from a prospective in-house cohort and publicly available data and profiled for DNA methylation using the Illumina MethylationEPIC array. Methylation-based classification using the glioma classifier developed by Ceccarelli et al. and estimation of the MGMT promoter methylation status via the MGMT-STP27 model were carried out. In addition, copy number variations (CNVs) and phylogeny were analyzed.

resultsAlmost half of the patients (22/56, 39%) harbored tumors composed of heterogeneous methylation subtypes. We found two predominant subtype combinations: classic-/mesenchymal-like, and mesenchymal-/pilocytic astrocytoma-like. Nine patients (16%) had tumors composed of subvolumes with and without MGMT promoter methylation, whereas 20 patients (36%) were homogeneously methylated, and 27 patients (48%) were homogeneously unmethylated. CNV analysis revealed high variations in many genes, including CDKN2A/B, EGFR, and PTEN. Phylogenetic analysis correspondingly showed a general pattern of CDKN2A/B loss and gain of EGFR, PDGFRA, and CDK4 during early stages of tumor development.

conclusions(Epi)genetic intratumoral heterogeneity is a hallmark of GB, both at DNA methylation and CNV level. This intratumoral heterogeneity is of utmost importance for molecular classification as well as for defining therapeutic targets in this disease, as single biopsies might underestimate the true molecular diversity in a tumor.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaBiopsyDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesErbB ReceptorsHumansPhylogenyProspective StudiesDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesErbB Receptorsglioblastomaheterogeneitymethylationphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID36055049
PMCPMC9588899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.