Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36054833›Full record

ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2022

Federated machine learning for a facilitated implementation of Artificial Intelligence in healthcare - a proof of concept study for the prediction of coronary artery calcification scores.

Justus Wolff, Julian Matschinske, Dietrich Baumgart, Anne Pytlik, Andreas Keck, Arunakiry Natarajan, Claudio E von Schacky, Josch K Pauling, Jan Baumbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Justus WolffChair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Maximus-von-Imhof-Forum 3, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Julian MatschinskeChair of Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Notkestreet 9-11, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.
Dietrich BaumgartPreventicum Essen, Theodor-Althoff-Str. 47 45133 Essen, Germany.
Anne PytlikPreventicum Essen, Theodor-Althoff-Str. 47 45133 Essen, Germany.
Andreas KeckSyte - Strategy Institute for Digital Health, Hohe Bleichen 8, 20354 Hamburg, Germany.
Arunakiry NatarajanIndependent Researcher, Digital Health, Informatics and Data Science, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Claudio E von SchackyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Josch K PaulingChair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Maximus-von-Imhof-Forum 3, 85354 Freising, Germany.
Jan BaumbachChair of Computational Systems Biology, University of Hamburg, Notkestreet 9-11, 22607 Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) still faces significant hurdles and one key factor is the access to data. One approach that could support that is federated machine learning (FL) since it allows for privacy preserving data access. For this proof of concept, a prediction model for coronary artery calcification scores (CACS) has been applied. The FL was trained based on the data in the different institutions, while the centralized machine learning model was trained on one allocation of data. Both algorithms predict patients with risk scores ≥5 based on age, biological sex, waist circumference, dyslipidemia and HbA1c. The centralized model yields a sensitivity of c. 66% and a specificity of c. 70%. The FL slightly outperforms that with a sensitivity of 67% while slightly underperforming it with a specificity of 69%. It could be demonstrated that CACS prediction is feasible via both, a centralized and an FL approach, and that both show very comparable accuracy. In order to increase accuracy, additional and a higher volume of patient data is required and for that FL is utterly necessary. The developed "CACulator" serves as proof of concept, is available as research tool and shall support future research to facilitate AI implementation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCoronary VesselsDelivery of Health CareHumansMachine LearningProof of Concept Studyartificial intelligencecoronary artery calcificationfederated machine learningprivacy-preserving data processing

Identifiers

PMID36054833
PMCPMC9800042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.