Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36054701›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2023

Factors associated with pediatric genetic counselors' practices related to bullying screening.

Jacob A Ginter, Tiffany Lepard-Tassin, James P Selig, Noelle R Danylchuk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob A GinterGenetic Counseling Department, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8481-3559
Tiffany Lepard-TassinGenetic Counseling Department, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4433-374X
James P SeligDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8964-1829
Noelle R DanylchukGenetic Counseling Department, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8031-6886
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bullying is reported in around 20% of children according to the US Department of Education and has been reported in the histories of individuals with genetic disorders. To our knowledge, there has never been a study surveying whether genetic counselors screen their pediatric patients for bullying. This is despite guidelines that pediatric healthcare providers should screen for bullying. The purpose of this study was to assess North American genetic counselors who see pediatric patients and enquire about their practices, attitudes, self-confidence, knowledge, and potential training needs in relation to bullying screening. In an anonymous online survey, 139 genetic counselors from the United States and Canada completed a modified version of the previously validated Healthcare Providers Practices, Attitudes, Self-Confidence, and Knowledge (HCP-PACK) instrument. Among our participant population, 85% reported they did not screen for bullying. This is despite no statistically significant difference in the amount of reported time spent on either initial or follow-up appointments between those who did or did not screen. Those who screened for bullying among their pediatric patients were more likely to view bullying as a healthcare problem (as measured on the attitude subscale) (t[135] = -2.07, p = 0.04) and had greater confidence in their ability to know how to assess for bullying (as measured on the self-confidence subscale) (t[135] = -2.90, p = 0.004) compared with participants who did not screen for bullying. Responses from genetic counselors who screened their patients for bullying demonstrated how screening for bullying can be aligned with the American Board of Genetic Counseling practice-based competencies. Even though the majority of participants did not view screening for bullying as a genetic counselor's role, 82.5% agreed that bullying was a healthcare problem and 63.6% thought genetic counselors should have additional educational opportunities to learn about bullying. Evidence-based guidance is needed to help genetic counselors interested in including screening for bullying in their practice.

Indexed as

BullyingCounselorsAttitudeChildGenetic CounselingHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesadolescentsattitudesbeliefsbullyingcommunitycounseling techniquesdisabilitydiscriminationdistressgenetic counselinggenetic counselorsinterventionlived experiencemental healthpediatricspsychosocialstigma

Identifiers

PMID36054701
PMCPMC10086965
OpenAlexW4293056499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.