Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36054676›Full record

ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2023

Patient- and physician-reported radiation-induced toxicity of short-course radiotherapy with a prolonged interval to surgery for rectal cancer.

Maaike E Verweij, Sieske Hoendervangers, Charlotte M von Hebel, Apollo Pronk, Anandi H W Schiphorst, Esther C J Consten, Anke B Smits, Joost T Heikens, Emiel G G Verdaasdonk, Tom Rozema and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient- and physician-reported radiation-induced toxicity of short-course radiotherapy with a prolonged interval to surgery for rectal cancer.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maaike E VerweijDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sieske HoendervangersDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Charlotte M von HebelDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Apollo PronkDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anandi H W SchiphorstDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Esther C J ConstenDepartment of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Anke B SmitsDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Joost T HeikensDepartment of Surgery, Rivierenland Hospital, Tiel, The Netherlands.
Emiel G G VerdaasdonkDepartment of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Tom RozemaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Verbeeten Institute, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Helena M VerkooijenDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wilhelmina M U van GrevensteinDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Martijn P W IntvenDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimA prolonged interval (>4 weeks) between short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy in five fractions) (SCRT-delay) and total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has been associated with a decreased postoperative complication rate and offers the possibility of organ preservation in the case of a complete tumour response. This prospective cohort study systematically evaluated patient-reported bowel dysfunction and physician-reported radiation-induced toxicity for 8 weeks following SCRT-delay.

methodPatients who were referred for SCRT-delay for intermediate risk, oligometastatic or locally advanced rectal cancer were included. Repeated measurements were done for patient-reported bowel dysfunction (measured by the low anterior resection syndrome [LARS] questionnaire and categorized as no, minor or major LARS) and physician-reported radiation-induced toxicity (according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0) before start of treatment (baseline), at completion of SCRT and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 weeks thereafter.

resultsFifty-one patients were included; 31 (61%) were men and the median age was 67 years (range 44-91). Patient-reported bowel dysfunction and physician-reported radiation-induced toxicity peaked at weeks 1-2 after completion of SCRT and gradually declined thereafter. Major LARS was reported by 44 patients (92%) at some time during SCRT-delay. Grade 3 radiation-induced toxicity was reported in 17 patients (33%) and concerned predominantly diarrhoea. No Grade 4-5 radiation-induced toxicity occurred.

conclusionDuring SCRT-delay, almost every patient experiences temporary mild-moderate radiation-induced toxicity and major LARS, but life-threatening toxicity is rare. SCRT-delay is a safe alternative to SCRT-direct surgery that should be proposed when counselling rectal cancer patients on neoadjuvant strategies.

Indexed as

Intestinal DiseasesRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRectumlow anterior resection syndromepatient-reported outcomesradiation-induced toxicityrectal cancershort course radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36054676
PMCPMC10087149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.