Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36054556›Full record

Trial reportClinical & experimental ophthalmology2022

Low-concentration atropine eyedrops for myopia control in a multi-racial cohort of Australian children: A randomised clinical trial.

Samantha Sze-Yee Lee, Gareth Lingham, Magdalena Blaszkowska, Paul G Sanfilippo, Adrian Koay, Maria Franchina, Audrey Chia, James Loughman, Daniel Ian Flitcroft, Christopher J Hammond and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Dose-Dependent Effects of Atropine on Accommodative and Binocular Visual Function for Myopia Control in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Negligible Rebound in Myopia Progression Following Cessation of Treatment with 0.01% Atropine for 3 years: Year-4 Results from the CHAMP Phase 3 Clinical Trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Response of accommodation and vergence systems to low dose atropine.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Samantha Sze-Yee LeeCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences(incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6635-1098
Gareth LinghamCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences(incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8957-0733
Magdalena BlaszkowskaCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences(incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7949-3834
Paul G SanfilippoCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1778-9154
Adrian KoayCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences(incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5378-4281
Maria FranchinaCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences(incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3984-3016
Audrey ChiaSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8166-4575
James LoughmanCentre for Eye Research Ireland, School of Physics, Clinical and Optometric Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3130-8991
Daniel Ian FlitcroftDepartment of Ophthalmology, Children's Health Ireland at Temple Street, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7004-6026
Christopher J HammondDepartments of Ophthalmology and Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3227-2620
Augusto Azuara-BlancoSchool of Medicine Dentistry and Biomedical Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4805-9322
Julie M CreweCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences(incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Antony ClarkCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences(incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8393-9870
David A MackeyCentre for Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences(incorporating the Lions Eye Institute), University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7914-4709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo test the hypothesis that 0.01% atropine eyedrops are a safe and effective myopia-control approach in Australian children.

methodsChildren (6-16 years; 49% Europeans, 18% East Asian, 22% South Asian, and 12% other/mixed ancestry) with documented myopia progression were enrolled into this single-centre randomised, parallel, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial and randomised to receive 0.01% atropine (n = 104) or placebo (n = 49) eyedrops (2:1 ratio) instilled nightly over 24 months (mean index age = 12.2 ± 2.5 and 11.2 ± 2.8 years, respectively). Outcome measures were the changes in spherical equivalent (SE) and axial length (AL) from baseline.

resultsAt 12 months, the mean SE and AL change from baseline were -0.31D (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.39 to -0.22) and 0.16 mm (95%CI = 0.13-0.20) in the atropine group and -0.53D (95%CI = -0.66 to -0.40) and 0.25 mm (95%CI = 0.20-0.30) in the placebo group (group difference p ≤ 0.01). At 24 months, the mean SE and AL change from baseline was -0.64D (95%CI = -0.73 to -0.56) and 0.34 mm (95%CI = 0.30-0.37) in the atropine group, and -0.78D (95%CI = -0.91 to -0.65) and 0.38 mm (95%CI = 0.33-0.43) in the placebo group. Group difference at 24 months was not statistically significant (p = 0.10). At 24 months, the atropine group had reduced accommodative amplitude and pupillary light response compared to the placebo group.

conclusionsIn Australian children, 0.01% atropine eyedrops were safe, well-tolerated, and had a modest myopia-control effect, although there was an apparent decrease in efficacy between 18 and 24 months, which is likely driven by a higher dropout rate in the placebo group.

Indexed as

AtropineMyopiaAdolescentAustraliaChildDisease ProgressionHumansOphthalmic SolutionsRefraction, OcularAtropineOphthalmic Solutionsatropineaxial lengthmyopiamyopia controlrandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID36054556
PMCPMC10086806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.