ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2022
Manual vacuum aspiration (women's MVA) for endometrial biopsy for patients with suspected endometrial malignancies.
Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Value of Negative-Pressure Endometrial Sampling Technique in Screening Endometrial Tuberculosis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Manual vacuum aspiration for postpartum pyometra.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimEndometrial biopsy is generally performed with a metal uterine curette sonde; however, recently, many types of vacuum aspirators are available, including the manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) system. We used the women's MVA system for endometrial sampling and evaluated its effectiveness in determining the presence of endometrial malignancy.
methodsForty-seven samples were examined using the following procedures after measuring endometrial thickness by transvaginal ultrasonography: fractional curettage biopsy (Bx; 20 samples), total curettage under general anesthesia (T/C; 13 samples), and MVA (14 samples). The quality of the endometrial samples was classified into four types: 1-4, where 1 denoted poor and 4, good quality.
resultsThe mean score of the MVA group was significantly higher than that of the partial curettage biopsy group (p = 0.0065). No differences were observed between the MVA and total curettage groups (p = 1.00). When patients were divided into two groups according to endometrial thickness (<10 mm or ≥10 mm) and analyzed, both the MVA and T/C groups did not show a significant difference in their scores compared to the Bx group when the endometrial thickness was <10 mm. However, when the endometrial thickness was ≥10 mm, the MVA and T/C groups had significantly better scores than the Bx group (p = 0.0225 and p = 0.0244, respectively). Vagal reflex, as an adverse event, was observed only in two patients in the Bx group (2/20, 10%).
conclusionConsidering its quality and safety, Karman-type MVA for endometrial sampling could be an alternative to fractional curettage using a metallic uterine curette sonde.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.