Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36054295›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2023

Outcomes of home-based primary care for homebound older adults: A randomized clinical trial.

Alex D Federman, Abraham Brody, Christine S Ritchie, Natalia Egorova, Arushi Arora, Sara Lubetsky, Ruchir Goswami, Maria Peralta, Jenny M Reckrey, Kenneth Boockvar and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Reducing Medication-Related Harm Through Home-Based Primary Care.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Evolution and challenges of physician-led home visits in Japan.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Alex D FedermanDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Abraham BrodyHartford Institute for Geriatric Nursing, NYU Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3405-7043
Christine S RitchieThe Mongan Institute and Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Natalia EgorovaDepartment of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Arushi AroraDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Sara LubetskyDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Ruchir GoswamiDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Maria PeraltaDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Jenny M ReckreyDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-8200
Kenneth BoockvarDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1165-5558
Shivani ShahCenter for Home Care Policy & Research, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, New York, New York, USA.
Katherine A OrnsteinDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Bruce LeffCenter for Transformative Geriatric Research, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Linda DeCherrieDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Albert L SiuDepartment of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJames J. Peters VA Medical Center · USJohn A. Hartford Foundation · USJohns Hopkins University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USVNS Health · US

Funding

Home-based Primary Care for Homebound Seniors: a Randomized Controlled TrialR01AG052557 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI FEDERMAN, ALEX D · 2016 to 2020
$3.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG052557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHomebound older adults are medically complex and often have difficulty accessing outpatient medical care. Home-based primary care (HBPC) may improve care and outcomes for this population but data from randomized trials of HBPC in the United States are limited.

methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial of HBPC versus office-based primary care for adults ages ≥65 years who reported ≥1 hospitalization in the prior 12 months and met the Medicare definition of homebound. HBPC was provided by teams consisting of a physician, nurse practitioner, nurse, and social worker. Data were collected at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Outcomes were quality of life, symptoms, satisfaction with care, hospitalizations, and emergency department (ED) visits. Recruitment was terminated early because more deaths were observed for intervention patients.

resultsThe study enrolled 229 patients, 65.4% of planned recruitment. The mean age was 82 (9.0) years and 72.3% had dementia. Of those assigned to HBPC, 34.2% never received it. Intervention patients had greater satisfaction with care than controls (2.26, 95% CI 1.46-3.06, p < 0.0001; effect size 0.74) and lower hospitalization rates (-17.9%, 95% CI -31.0% to -1.0%; p = 0.001; number needed to treat 6, 95% CI 3-100). There were no significant differences in quality of life (1.25, 95% CI -0.39-2.89, p = 0.13), symptom burden (-1.92, 95% CI -5.22-1.37, p = 0.25) or ED visits (1.2%, 95% CI -10.5%-12.4%; p = 0.87). There were 24 (21.1%) deaths among intervention patients and 12 (10.7%) among controls (p < 0.0001).

conclusionHBPC was associated with greater satisfaction with care and lower hospitalization rates but also more deaths compared to office-based primary care. Additional research is needed to understand the nature of the higher death rate for HBPC patients, as well as to determine the effects of HBPC on quality of life and symptom burden given the trial's early termination.

Indexed as

Homebound PersonsHome Care ServicesAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMedicarePrimary Health CareQuality of LifeUnited Stateshome-based primary carehomeboundhospitalizationsatisfaction with

Identifiers

PMID36054295
PMCPMC9939556
OpenAlexW4292444062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.