Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36054282›Full record

ReviewClinical cardiology2022

Cardiac rehabilitation: Effective yet underutilized in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Natalie J Bracewell, Jeffrey Plasschaert, Charles Richard Conti, Ellen C Keeley, Jamie B Conti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natalie J BracewellDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4096-984X
Jeffrey PlasschaertDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Charles Richard ContiDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Ellen C KeeleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-6662
Jamie B ContiDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac rehabilitation is a comprehensive program that treats patients with multiple cardiac conditions including post-myocardial infarction, stable angina, post-coronary artery bypass surgery, chronic heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease with structured exercise, and nutrition and risk factor counseling. It is an effective tool that has been shown to improve not only quality of life but also reduce adverse cardiac events, including death. While the value of cardiac rehabilitation is supported by a large body of evidence and its recommendation by the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology it is significantly underutilized due to both patient and systemic factors. Continued efforts should be made to remove the obstacles to make cardiac rehabilitation available to all those who qualify.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationCardiovascular DiseasesMyocardial InfarctionCoronary Artery BypassHumansQuality of Lifecardiac rehabilitationchronic heart failureischemic heart diseaseperipheral arterial diseasestructured exercise

Identifiers

PMID36054282
PMCPMC9707561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.