Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36054243›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2023

A single arm prospective feasibility study evaluating wound closure with a unique wearable device that provides intermittent plantar compression and offloading in the treatment of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.

David G Armstrong, Dennis P Orgill, Paul M Glat, Robert D Galiano, Zachary L Rasor, Adam Isaac, Marissa Carter, Charles M Zelen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David G ArmstrongDivision of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, California, Los Angeles, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1887-9175
Dennis P OrgillDivision of Research, Professional Education and Research Institute, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8279-7310
Paul M GlatDeparttment of Surgery, Drexel University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert D GalianoDivision of Plastic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9552-6483
Zachary L RasorFoot and Ankle Specialists of the Mid-Atlantic (FASMA), Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Adam IsaacFoot and Ankle Specialists of the Mid-Atlantic (FASMA), Frederick, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5338-3445
Marissa CarterStrategic Solutions, Bozeman, Montana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-6639
Charles M ZelenDivision of Research, Professional Education and Research Institute, Roanoke, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5682-7056
Professional Education and Research Institute · USDrexel University · USNorthwestern University · USStrategic Solutions Consulting (United States) · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Compedica 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence and economic burden of diabetic foot ulcers continues to rise throughout the world. In this prospective study, a unique device designed to offload the wound, enhance circulation and monitor patient compliance was evaluated for safety and efficacy. The device provides offloading and intermittent plantar compression to improve the pedal flow of oxygenated blood and support wound healing while recording patient use. Ten patients with non-healing diabetic foot ulcers UTgrade 1A/Wagner grade 1 were treated weekly for up to 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was complete wound closure at 12 weeks, and secondary endpoints included healing time, percent area reduction and changes in pain using the visual analogue pain scale. Eight out of ten wounds healed within 12 weeks(80%), and the mean healing time was 41 days(95% CI:24.3-58.3). The percent area reduction was 75(SD:53.9). The baseline visual analogue pain scale was 4.5(2.9) as compared with 3.3(3.4) at end of study. No device-related or serious adverse events were reported. This unique intermediate plantar compression and offloading device may be considered as an alternative for safe and effective for treatment of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers. During treatment, wound healing was significantly accelerated, and pain was improved. Larger randomised controlled trials are underway to validate these early findings.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootFeasibility StudiesFootHumansPainProspective Studiesdiabetic foot ulcerintermittent plantar compressionoffloadingwound healing

Identifiers

PMID36054243
PMCPMC9927907
OpenAlexW4293206487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.