Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36054227›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Sleep restriction impairs visually and memory-guided force control.

Sarah A Brinkerhoff, Gina M Mathew, William M Murrah, Anne-Marie Chang, Jaimie A Roper, Kristina A Neely

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A BrinkerhoffSchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1030-5233
Gina M MathewProgram in Public Health, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States of America.
William M MurrahDepartment of Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Anne-Marie ChangDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jaimie A RoperSchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Kristina A NeelySchool of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Auburn University · USPennsylvania State University · USStony Brook School · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
A novel use of web-based software to efficiently triage pre-surgical patients basR44TR000045 · NCATS · MEDSLEUTH, INC. · PI KALAMAS, ALICIA GRUBER · 2012 to 2012
$546k
NCATS NIH HHS R44 TR000045NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sleep loss is a common phenomenon with consequences to physical and mental health. While the effects of sleep restriction on working memory are well documented, it is unknown how sleep restriction affects continuous force control. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of sleep restriction on visually and memory-guided force production magnitude and variability. We hypothesized that both visually and memory-guided force production would be impaired after sleep restriction. Fourteen men participated in an eleven-day inpatient sleep study and completed a grip force task after two nights of ten hours' time in bed (baseline); four nights of five hours' time in bed (sleep restriction); and one night of ten hours' time in bed (recovery). The force task entailed four 20-second trials of isometric force production with the thumb and index finger targeting 25% of the participant's maximum voluntary contraction. During visually guided trials, participants had continuous visual feedback of their force production. During memory-guided trials, visual feedback was removed for the last 12 seconds of each trial. During both conditions, participants were told to maintain the target force production. After sleep restriction, participants decreased the magnitude of visually guided, but not memory-guided, force production, suggesting that visual attention tasks are more affected by sleep loss than memory-guided tasks. Participants who reported feeling more alert after sleep restriction and recovery sleep produced higher force during memory-guided, but not visually guided, force production, suggesting that the perception of decreased alertness may lead to more attention to the task during memory-guided visual tasks.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersFeedback, SensoryHand StrengthHumansMalePolysomnographySleepSleep Deprivation

Identifiers

PMID36054227
PMCPMC9439228
OpenAlexW4294295948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.