ArticleJournal of clinical apheresis2022
Distinguishing and overlapping laboratory results of thrombotic microangiopathies in HIV infection: Can scoring systems assist?
Article in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peripheral Arterial Disease in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
- Impact of a factor Xa inhibitor (apixaban) on SIV pathogenesis and response to antiretroviral therapy.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Distinguishing and overlapping laboratory results of thrombotic microangiopathies in HIV infection: Can scoring systems assist?Journal of clinical apheresis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection are at risk of thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) notably thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). Overlap between laboratory results exists resulting in diagnostic ambiguity.
methodsRoutine laboratory results of 71 patients with HIV-associated TTP (HIV-TTP) and 81 with DIC with concomitant HIV infection (HIV-DIC) admitted between 2015 and 2021 to academic hospitals in Johannesburg, South Africa were retrospectively reviewed. Both the PLASMIC and the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) DIC scores were calculated.
resultsPatients with HIV-TTP had significantly (P < .001) increased schistocytes and features of hemolysis including elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/upper-limit-of-normal ratio (median of 9 (interquartile range [IQR] 5-12) vs 3 (IQR 2-5)) but unexpectedly lower fibrinogen (median 2.8 (IQR 2.2-3.4) vs 4 g/L (IQR 2.5-9.2)) and higher D-dimer (median 4.8 (IQR 2.4-8.1) vs 3.6 g/L (IQR 1.7-6.2)) levels vs the HIV-DIC cohort. Patients with HIV-DIC were more immunocompromised with frequent secondary infections, higher platelet and hemoglobin levels, more deranged coagulation parameters and less hemolysis. Overlap in scoring systems was however observed.
conclusionThe laboratory parameter overlap between HIV-DIC and HIV-TTP might reflect a shared pathogenesis including endothelial dysfunction and inflammation and further research is required. Fibrinogen in DIC may be elevated as an acute phase reactant and D-dimers may reflect the extensive hemostatic activation in HIV-TTP. Inclusion of additional parameters in TMA scoring systems such the LDH/upper-limit-of-normal ratio, schistocytes count and wider access to ADAMTS-13 testing may enhance diagnostic accuracy and ensure appropriate utilization of plasma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.