Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053926›Full record

ReviewTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2022

Boosting ethics review capacity in public health emergency situations: Co-creation of a training model for French-speaking research ethics committees.

Vivi Maketa, Flory Luzolo, Hypolite Muhindo Mavoko, Yves Claeys, Felicien Munday, Robert Yemesi Benge, Willy Bongo Pasi, Darius Mankindu, Samuel Mampunza, Philippe Lukanu and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Vivi MaketaUniversity of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Flory LuzoloUniversity of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Hypolite Muhindo MavokoUniversity of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Yves ClaeysInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Felicien MundayComité National d'Ethique de la Santé, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Robert Yemesi BengeComité National d'Ethique de la Santé, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Willy Bongo PasiComité d'Ethique de l'Ecole de Santé Publique de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Darius MankinduComité d'Ethique de l'Ecole de Santé Publique de Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Samuel MampunzaComité d'Ethique de l'Université Protestante au Congo, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Philippe LukanuComité d'Ethique de l'Université Protestante au Congo, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Muteho KasongoComité d'Ethique de l'Université Libre des Pays des Grands Lacs, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Edmond Ntabe NamegabeComité d'Ethique de l'Université Libre des Pays des Grands Lacs, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Leopold Kambale KarafuliComité d'Ethique de l'Université Libre des Pays des Grands Lacs, Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Delphin Phanzu MavingaComité d'Ethique du Centre de Recherche en Santé de Kimpese, Kimpese, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Emmanuel Milandu MassambaComité d'Ethique du Centre de Recherche en Santé de Kimpese, Kimpese, Democratic Republic of Congo.
César-Augustin Muaka KhosoComité d'Ethique du Centre de Recherche en Santé de Kimpese, Kimpese, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Raffaella RavinettoInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 214711/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthics review preparedness is a major foundation for national effective response to public health emergencies, because it promotes pertinent research and enhances the protection of research participants and communities. In low-income countries, it can also promote equitable research partnership. However, most relevant literature is in English and not easily accessible for the members of research ethics committees in French-speaking African countries.

methodsA training module in French, addressing the issue of research ethics review during outbreaks and other public health emergencies, was designed based on a non-systematic literature review, and in order to be complementary to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) national guidelines for ethics review. The module was administered to 42 members of the five ethics committees in DRC that expressed their interest for the training.

resultThis training, co-designed with local stakeholders, in the local working language and taking into account local circumstances and regulation, provided participants with up-to-date insights of research ethics (and research ethics preparedness) in public health emergencies. It resulted in rich reflection and knowledge-sharing on good practices across the ethics committees.

conclusionAs most participating ethics committees do not have yet explicit standard operating procedures for expedited review of protocols submitted in emergency situations, this would be a next important step to facilitate emergency reviews in the most efficient way.

Indexed as

Ethics Committees, ResearchPublic HealthEmergenciesEthical ReviewHumansLanguageco-creationDemocratic Republic of Congodeveloping countriesethicsresearchSub-Saharan Africatraining

Identifiers

PMID36053926
PMCPMC9826200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.