Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053921›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2022

Student reflections on an interdisciplinary pandemics course utilising systems thinking.

Karen Shelley, Nicholas J Osborne, Simon Reid, Angela Willemsen, Sheleigh Lawler

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Teaching Systems Thinking in Postgraduate Public Health: A Scoping Review of Curricular Approaches.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Editorial: Education in public health: 2022.Frontiers in public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Student reflections on an interdisciplinary pandemics course utilising systems thinking.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Karen ShelleySchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2478-6883
Nicholas J OsborneSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6700-2284
Simon ReidSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6103-4429
Angela WillemsenSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-9500
Sheleigh LawlerSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-0551
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedThe complexity and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the need to change training of public health professionals in higher education by shifting from siloed specialisations to interdisciplinary collaboration. At the end of 2020 and 2021, public health professionals collaboratively designed and delivered, a week-long intensive course-Public Health in Pandemics. The aim of this research study was to understand whether the use of systems thinking in the design and delivery of the course enabled students to grasp the interdisciplinary nature of contemporary health promotion and public health practice. RESEARCH

methodsTwo focus group interviews (n = 5 and 3/47) and a course opinion survey (n = 11/47) were utilised to gather information from students regarding experiences and perceptions of course design and delivery, and to determine if students felt better able to understand the complex nature of pandemics and pandemic responses. MAJOR

findingsStudents provided positive feedback on the course and believed that the course design and delivery assisted in understanding the complex nature of health problems and the ways in which health promotion and public health practitioners need to work across sectors with diverse disciplines for pandemic responses.

conclusionsThe use of an integrated interdisciplinary approach to course design and delivery enabled students used systems thinking to understand the complexity in preparing for and responding to a pandemic. This approach may have utility in preparing an agile, iterative and adaptive health promotion and public health workforce more capable of facing the challenges and complexity in public health.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCurriculumHumansPublic HealthStudentsSystems Analysiscurriculum and pedagogyhealth promotioninterdisciplinarypublic health

Identifiers

PMID36053921
PMCPMC9805047
OpenAlexW4289133626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.