Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053918›Full record

ArticleVeterinary surgery : VS2022

Delayed union, non-union and mal-union in 442 dogs.

William George Marshall, Barbro Filliquist, Emmanouil Tzimtzimis, Agnieszka Fracka, Jose Miquel, Javier Garcia, Maria Dalla Fontana

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary surgery : VS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Internal Fixation Using VitconeAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

William George MarshallSmall Animal Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1727-4609
Barbro FilliquistDepartment of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6116-6520
Emmanouil TzimtzimisSmall Animal Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Agnieszka FrackaSmall Animal Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jose MiquelSmall Animal Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Javier GarciaSmall Animal Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Maria Dalla FontanaSmall Animal Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3396-9518
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) To estimate the prevalence of delayed union, non-union and mal-union in canine fractures; (2) to describe fracture, demographic, and treatment characteristics for these outcomes; (3) to identify risk factors for delayed or non-union. STUDY

designRetrospective study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Four hundred and forty two dogs (461 fractures).

methodsA review was conducted of clinical records and radiographs from 2 teaching hospitals. "Union," "delayed union," "non-union" and "mal-union" were defined, and fracture, demographic, treatment, and outcome variables described. Differences in proportions or medians between "union," "delayed union" and "non-union" were tested using χ

resultsMedian radiographic follow up was 53 days (14-282). Delayed union occurred in 13.9% of fractures (64/461), non-union in 4.6% (21/461), and mal-union in 0.7% (3/461). Risk factors for delayed or non-union were age (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.12-1.31); comminuted fracture (OR 4.24, 95% CI 2.4-7.5); treatment with bone graft (all types) (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.3-8.5); surgical site infection (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.17-8.97), and major implant failure (OR 12.94, 95% CI 5.06-33.1).

conclusionOlder dogs, dogs with comminuted fractures, surgical site infection, or major implant failure were at increased odds of delayed or non-union. Radius and ulna fractures in toy breed dogs were not at increased odds of delayed or non-union. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The identified risk factors should inform fracture planning and prognosticating. The prognosis for radial fractures in toy breeds appears better than historically believed.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesFractures, ComminutedRadius FracturesUlna FracturesAnimalsBone PlatesDogsRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID36053918
PMCPMC9804201
OpenAlexW4293366142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.