Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053814›Full record

ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2022

Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication.

Harriet Smith, Chloe Lane, Reem Al-Jawahiri, Megan Freeth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The pleiotropic spectrum of proximal 16p11.2 CNVs.American journal of human genetics · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Sensory processing in 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harriet SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9590-6144
Chloe LaneDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7234-5783
Reem Al-JawahiriDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5689-3368
Megan FreethDepartment of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0534-9095
University of Sheffield · GBThe Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

The Children's Hospital Charity, Sheffield
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deletions and duplications at the chromosomal region of 16p11.2 have a broad range of phenotypic effects including increased likelihood of intellectual disability, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), epilepsy, and language and motor delays. However, whether and how sensory processing is affected has not yet been considered in detail. Parents/caregivers of 38 children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 31 children with a 16p11.2 duplication completed the Sensory Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) and the Child Sensory Profile 2 (CSP-2) along with other standardized questionnaires assessing autistic traits (SRS-2), ADHD traits (Conners 3), anxiety (SCAS-P) and adaptive behavior (VABS-3). SBQ and CSP-2 responses found that sensory processing differences were clearly evident in both 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication, though there was significant variation in both cohorts. SBQ data indicated the frequency and impact of sensory behavior were more severe when compared to neurotypical children, with levels being similar to autistic children. CSP-2 data indicated over 70% of children displayed clear differences in sensory registration (missing sensory input). Seventy-one percent with 16p11.2 duplications were also unusually sensitive to sensory information and 57% with 16p11.2 duplications were unusually avoidant of sensory stimuli. This first detailed assessment of sensory processing, alongside other clinical features, in relatively large cohorts of children with a 16p11.2 deletion and 16p11.2 duplication demonstrates that sensory processing differences have a profound impact on their lives.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderChromosome DisordersIntellectual DisabilityChildChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 16HumansPerceptionADHDanxietyautisticsensory processingsensory systems

Identifiers

PMID36053814
PMCPMC9826336
OpenAlexW4294192994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.