ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2022
Predictors of extubation success: a population-based study of neonates below a gestational age of 26 weeks.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07240038 (Evaluation of an Evidence Based, Bundled Intervention to Reduce Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Neonatal Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of an Evidence Based, Bundled Intervention to Reduce Incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Neonatal Units (INBERNAV-Neo)
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Predictors of extubation failure in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Pooled it
- Predictors of extubation success for premature infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Predictive model development for premature infant extubation outcomes: development and analysis.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Accuracy of lung ultrasound in predicting successful extubation in preterm infants born ≤ 25 weeks.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Article
- Risk factors and adverse outcomes of extubation failure in preterm infants ≤32 weeks with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Associations between unit workloads and outcomes of first extubation attempts in extremely premature infants below a gestational age of 26 weeks.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of the study was to investigate first extubation attempts among extremely premature (EP) infants and to explore factors that may increase the quality of clinical judgement of extubation readiness. DESIGN AND
methodA population-based study was conducted to explore first extubation attempts for EP infants born before a gestational age (GA) of 26 weeks in Norway between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018. Eligible infants were identified via the Norwegian Neonatal Network database. The primary outcome was successful extubation, defined as no reintubation within 72 hours after extubation.
resultsAmong 482 eligible infants, 316 first extubation attempts were identified. Overall, 173 (55%) infants were successfully extubated, whereas the first attempt failed in 143 (45%) infants. A total of 261 (83%) infants were extubated from conventional ventilation (CV), and 55 (17%) infants were extubated from high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). In extubation from CV, pre-extubation fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO
conclusionsThe correct timing of extubation in EP infants is important. In this national cohort, 55% of the first extubation attempts were successful. Our results suggest that additional emphasis on oxygen requirement, sex and general condition at birth may further increase extubation success when clinicians are about to extubate EP infants for the first time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.