Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053624›Full record

Observational studyBMJ paediatrics open2022

Use of parenteral nutrition in the first postnatal week in England and Wales: an observational study using real-world data.

James Webbe, Cheryl Battersby, Nicholas Longford, Kayleigh Oughham, Sabita Uthaya, Neena Modi, Chris Gale

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ paediatrics open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03767634 (Outcomes Following Early Parenteral Nutrition Use in Preterm Neonates), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03767634 completednot on this map

Outcomes Following Early Parenteral Nutrition Use in Preterm Neonates

TypeobservationalSponsorImperial College LondonRan2019 to 2021Enrolled97,507ConditionsNeonatal Death, PrematurityArmsParenteral nutrition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James WebbeNeonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8546-3212
Cheryl BattersbyNeonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2898-553X
Nicholas LongfordNeonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Kayleigh OughhamNeonatal Data Analysis Unit, Imperial College London, Faculty of Medicine, London, UK.
Sabita UthayaNeonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Neena ModiNeonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Chris GaleNeonatal Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK christopher.gale@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0707-876X
Imperial College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N008405/1Medical Research Council MR/V036866/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParenteral nutrition (PN) is used to provide supplemental support to neonates while enteral feeding is being established. PN is a high-cost intervention with beneficial and harmful effects. Internationally, there is substantial variation in how PN is used, and there are limited contemporary data describing use across Great Britain.

objectiveTo describe PN use in the first postnatal week in infants born and admitted to neonatal care in England, Scotland and Wales.

methodData describing neonates admitted to National Health Service neonatal units between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017, extracted from routinely recorded data held the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD); the denominator was live births, from Office for National Statistics.

resultsOver the study period 62 145 neonates were given PN in the first postnatal week (1.4% of all live births); use was higher in more preterm neonates (76% of livebirths at <28 weeks, 0.2% of term livebirths) and in neonates with lower birth weight. 15% (9181/62145) of neonates given PN in the first postnatal week were born at term. There was geographic variation in PN administration: the proportion of live births given PN within neonatal regional networks ranged from 1.0% (95% CIs 1.0 to 1.0) to 2.8% (95% CI 2.7 to 2.9). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Significant variation exists in neonatal PN use; it is unlikely this reflects optimal use of an expensive intervention. Research is needed to identify which babies will benefit most and which are at risk of harm from early PN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03767634; registration date: 6 December 2018.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureState MedicineEnglandHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParenteral NutritionWalesepidemiologyneonatology

Identifiers

PMID36053624
PMCPMC9422803
OpenAlexW4293239531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.