Observational studyBMJ paediatrics open2022
Use of parenteral nutrition in the first postnatal week in England and Wales: an observational study using real-world data.
Observational study in BMJ paediatrics open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03767634 (Outcomes Following Early Parenteral Nutrition Use in Preterm Neonates), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Outcomes Following Early Parenteral Nutrition Use in Preterm Neonates
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mucous Fistula Refeeding in Newborns: Why, When, How, and Where? Insights from a Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Healthcare resource use, costs and health-related quality of life in the UK-Irish Atopic eczema Systemic Therapy Register (A-STAR): a pilot study.Skin health and disease · 2026Article
- Neonatal Intensive Care Admissions and Outcomes in Malta from 2019 to 2022-A Retrospective Observational Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association of Standardized Parenteral Nutrition with Early Neonatal Growth of Moderately Preterm Infants: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Nutrients · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundParenteral nutrition (PN) is used to provide supplemental support to neonates while enteral feeding is being established. PN is a high-cost intervention with beneficial and harmful effects. Internationally, there is substantial variation in how PN is used, and there are limited contemporary data describing use across Great Britain.
objectiveTo describe PN use in the first postnatal week in infants born and admitted to neonatal care in England, Scotland and Wales.
methodData describing neonates admitted to National Health Service neonatal units between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017, extracted from routinely recorded data held the National Neonatal Research Database (NNRD); the denominator was live births, from Office for National Statistics.
resultsOver the study period 62 145 neonates were given PN in the first postnatal week (1.4% of all live births); use was higher in more preterm neonates (76% of livebirths at <28 weeks, 0.2% of term livebirths) and in neonates with lower birth weight. 15% (9181/62145) of neonates given PN in the first postnatal week were born at term. There was geographic variation in PN administration: the proportion of live births given PN within neonatal regional networks ranged from 1.0% (95% CIs 1.0 to 1.0) to 2.8% (95% CI 2.7 to 2.9). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Significant variation exists in neonatal PN use; it is unlikely this reflects optimal use of an expensive intervention. Research is needed to identify which babies will benefit most and which are at risk of harm from early PN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03767634; registration date: 6 December 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.