Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053439›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2022

Teachers Can Make a Difference in Bullying: Effects of Teacher Interventions on Students' Adoption of Bully, Victim, Bully-Victim or Defender Roles across Time.

Christoph Burger, Dagmar Strohmeier, Lenka Kollerová

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perception of Bullying in Early Childhood Education in Spain: Pre-School Teachers vs. Psychologists.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Christoph BurgerFaculty of Psychology, Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. christoph.burger@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9923-5111
Dagmar StrohmeierSchool of Medical Engineering and Applied Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Linz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1479-6674
Lenka KollerováCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-454X
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZUniversity of Applied Sciences Upper Austria · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky GA15-00682SMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy 7AMB17AT034Österreichische Agentur für Internationale Mobilität und Kooperation in Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung CZ17/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School bullying is a serious problem worldwide, but little is known about how teacher interventions influence the adoption of bullying-related student roles. This study surveyed 750 early adolescents (50.5% female; average age: 12.9 years, SD = 0.4) from 39 classrooms in two waves, six months apart. Peer ratings of classmates were used to categorize students to five different bullying-related roles (criterion: >1 SD): bully, victim, bully-victim, defender, and non-participant. Student ratings of teachers were used to obtain class-level measures of teacher interventions: non-intervention, disciplinary sanctions, group discussion, and mediation/victim support. Controlling for student- and class-level background variables, two multilevel multinomial logistic regression analyses were computed to predict students' bullying-related roles at wave 2. In the static model, predictors were teacher interventions at wave 1, and in the dynamic model, predictors were teacher intervention changes across time. The static model showed that disciplinary sanctions reduced the likelihood of being a bully or victim, and group discussion raised the likelihood of being a defender. Mediation/victim support raised the likelihood of being a bully. The dynamic model complemented these results by indicating that increases in group discussion across time raised the likelihood of being a defender, whereas increases in non-intervention across time raised the likelihood of being a victim and reduced the likelihood of being a defender. These results show that teacher interventions have distinct effects on students' adoption of bullying-related roles and could help to better target intervention strategies. The findings carry practical implications for the professional training of prospective and current teachers.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupProspective StudiesSchoolsStudentsAnti-bullyingBullyingDisciplinary sanctionsGroup discussionsTeacher interventionsTeacher strategies

Identifiers

PMID36053439
PMCPMC9596519
OpenAlexW4294354190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.