Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053344›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2023

Exploring the relationships between first impressions and MMI ratings: a pilot study.

Dietrich Klusmann, Mirjana Knorr, Wolfgang Hampe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dietrich KlusmannInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), N41, Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. klusmann@uke.de.
Mirjana KnorrInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), N41, Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Wolfgang HampeInstitute of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), N41, Martinistr, 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

bundesministerium für bildung und forschung 01GK1801A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phenomenon of first impression is well researched in social psychology, but less so in the study of OSCEs and the multiple mini interview (MMI). To explore its bearing on the MMI method we included a rating of first impression in the MMI for student selection executed 2012 at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (196 applicants, 26 pairs of raters) and analyzed how it was related to MMI performance ratings made by (a) the same rater, and (b) a different rater. First impression was assessed immediately after an applicant entered the test room. Each MMI-task took 5 min and was rated subsequently. Internal consistency was α = .71 for first impression and α = .69 for MMI performance. First impression and MMI performance correlated by r = .49. Both measures weakly predicted performance in two OSCEs for communication skills, assessed 18 months later. MMI performance did not increment prediction above the contribution of first impression and vice versa. Prediction was independent of whether or not the rater who rated first impression also rated MMI performance. The correlation between first impression and MMI-performance is in line with the results of corresponding social psychological studies, showing that judgements based on minimal information moderately predict behavioral measures. It is also in accordance with the notion that raters often blend their specific assessment task outlined in MMI-instructions with the self-imposed question of whether a candidate would fit the role of a medical doctor.

Indexed as

CommunicationSchool Admission CriteriaAcademic Medical CentersHumansPilot ProjectsSchools, MedicalFirst impressionMMIOSCERater-based assessmentRater cognition

Identifiers

PMID36053344
PMCPMC10169880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.