Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053334›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2022

An overview of Internal Medicine Point-of-Care Ultrasound rotations in Canada.

Mathilde Gaudreau-Simard, Katie Wiskar, Elaine Kilabuk, Michael H Walsh, Michael Sattin, Jonathan Wong, Zain Burhani, Shane Arishenkoff, Jeffrey Yu, Ada W Lam and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathilde Gaudreau-SimardDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, 1053 Carling Ave, D 107, Box 209, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada. magaudreau@toh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-4162
Katie WiskarDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Elaine KilabukDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michael H WalshDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Michael SattinDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Jonathan WongDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Zain BurhaniDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Shane ArishenkoffDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jeffrey YuDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Ada W LamDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Irene W Y MaDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Western University · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a growing part of internal medicine training programs. Dedicated POCUS rotations are emerging as a particularly effective tool in POCUS training, allowing for longitudinal learning and emphasizing both psychomotor skills and the nuances of clinical integration. In this descriptive paper, we set out to review the state of POCUS rotations in Canadian Internal Medicine training programs.

resultsWe identify five programs currently offering a POCUS rotation. These rotations are offered over two to thirteen blocks each year, run over one to four weeks and support one to four learners. Across all programs, these rotations are set up as a consultative service that offers POCUS consultation to general internal medicine inpatients, with some extension of scope to the hospitalist service or surgical subspecialties. The funding model for the preceptors of these rotations is predominantly fee-for-service using consultation codes, in addition to concomitant clinical work to supplement income. All but one program has access to hospital-based archiving of POCUS exams. Preceptors dedicate ten to fifty hours to the rotation each week and ensure that all trainee exams are reviewed and documented in the patient's medical records in the form of a consultation note. Two of the five programs also support a POCUS fellowship. Only two out of five programs have established learner policies. All programs rely on In-Training Evaluation Reports to provide trainee feedback on their performance during the rotation.

conclusionsWe describe the different elements of the POCUS rotations currently offered in Canadian Internal Medicine training programs. We share some lessons learned around the elements necessary for a sustainable rotation that meets high educational standards. We also identify areas for future growth, which include the expansion of learner policies, as well as the evolution of trainee assessment in the era of competency-based medical education. Our results will help educators that are endeavoring setting up POCUS rotations achieve success.

Indexed as

EducationInternal MedicinePOCUSPoint-of-care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36053334
PMCPMC9440170
OpenAlexW4294169866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.