Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053279›Full record

SynthesisClinical child psychology and psychiatry2023

Family therapy for adolescents with depression and suicidal ideation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Luxsiya Waraan, Johan Siqveland, Ketil Hanssen-Bauer, Nikolai O Czjakowski, Brynhildur Axelsdóttir, Lars Mehlum, Marianne Aalberg

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luxsiya WaraanDivision of Mental Health Services, 60483Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1019-434X
Johan SiqvelandDivision of Mental Health Services, 60483Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0124-8484
Ketil Hanssen-BauerDivision of Mental Health Services, 60483Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Nikolai O CzjakowskiDepartment of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Brynhildur AxelsdóttirRegional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway, Oslo, Norway.
Lars MehlumNational Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention, Institute of Clinical Medicine, 6305University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Marianne AalbergDivision of Mental Health Services, 60483Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2719-9411
University of Oslo · NOAkershus University Hospital · NOCenter for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review and meta-analyze the effectiveness of family therapy compared to other active treatments for adolescents with depressive disorders or suicidal ideation.

methodWe conducted a systematic search of The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL and Web of Science and performed two meta-analyses of outcomes for depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation.

resultsWe screened 5,940 records and identified 10 randomized controlled studies of family therapy for depressive disorder or suicidal ideation in adolescents with an active treatment comparison group. Nine studies reported outcome measures of depressive symptoms and four reported outcome measures of suicidal ideation. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between family therapy and active comparison treatments for end-of-treatment levels of depression. For suicidal ideation our meta-analysis showed a significant effect in favour of family therapy over comparison treatments for suicidal ideation.

conclusionsBased on the current body of research, we found that family therapy is not superior to other psychotherapies in the treatment of depressive disorder. However, family therapy leads to significantly improved outcomes for suicidal ideation, compared to other psychotherapies. The evidence for the treatment of depression is of low quality needs more research.

Indexed as

Family TherapySuicidal IdeationAdolescentCombined Modality TherapyDepressionHumansPsychotherapydepressionfamily therapysuicidal ideationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36053279
PMCPMC10018060
OpenAlexW4294275420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.