Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052946›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of occupational medicine and environmental health2022

To vaccinate or not to vaccinate - BNT162b2 seroconversion rate and side effects among Polish healthcare workers.

Bartosz Siewert, Anna Szabat, Małgorzata Chądzińska-Cebula, Natalia Purpurowicz-Miękus, Piotr Sujkowski, Rafał Spachacz, Grzegorz Dworacki, Jacek Wysocki, Danuta Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska, Ewelina Gowin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bartosz SiewertPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland (Department of Preventive Health).
Anna SzabatPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland (Department of Preventive Health).
Małgorzata Chądzińska-CebulaChildren's Hospital in Poznan, Poznań, Poland.
Natalia Purpurowicz-MiękusChildren's Hospital in Poznan, Poznań, Poland.
Piotr SujkowskiChildren's Hospital in Poznan, Poznań, Poland.
Rafał SpachaczHospital in Slupca, Słupca, Poland.
Grzegorz DworackiPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland (Department of Clinical Immunology).
Jacek WysockiPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland (Department of Preventive Health).
Danuta Januszkiewicz-LewandowskaUniversity of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland (Department of Oncology - Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation Poznan).
Ewelina GowinPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland (Department of Preventive Health).
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe study aimed to analyze the effect of BNT162b2 vaccination among Polish healthcare workers in terms of serologic response and adverse events. MATERIAL AND

methodsA questionnaire survey covered data in the period January 1-March 31, 2021 gathered in 2 hospitals in Wielkopolska, Poland. Additionally, serological analysis (SARS-CoV-2 anti-S protein IgG) was performed.

resultsA total of 617 medical workers were vaccinated with BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, Pfizer). Data from the questionnaires were received from all of the staff after the first and the second dose. No severe side effects were observed. The most common side effect following the first and second doses of vaccination was pain at the injection site. After the first dose, 3 (1.4 %) women aged 18-55 years, 5 women (3.9 %), and 3 men (8.3 %) aged >55 years had negative SARS-CoV-2 anti-S protein IgG result. After the second dose, all those who agreed to have antibodies tested responded to vaccination with positive SARS-CoV-2 anti-S protein IgG results.

conclusionsVaccination tolerance was good in the studied population; no severe side effects were observed. After the second dose, all tested healthcare workers responded to vaccination with antibody production. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(6):761-66.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansImmunoglobulin GMalePolandSARS-CoV-2SeroconversionAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineImmunoglobulin GBNT162b2COVID-19healthcareSARS-CoV-2side effectvaccination

Identifiers

PMID36052946
PMCPMC10464737
OpenAlexW4294253416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.