ArticleANZ journal of surgery2022
Improving surgical excellence: first experience of a video-based intervention in outpatients.
Article in ANZ journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Non-technical errors associated with deaths in surgical care, Australia, 2012-2019, by surgical specialty (Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality): a retrospective cohort study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are limited opportunities for surgeons to engage in active learning programs once they achieve Fellowship, especially for non-technical skills such as communication. This study aims to address this gap by evaluating a peer-based coaching program in non-technical skill using video-recorded patient consultations from a routine outpatient clinic.
methodsStandard outpatient consultations between consultant surgeons and patients were video recorded. The surgeon viewed the videos with a peer-coach (senior surgeon) who helped identify areas of strength and areas for improvement. To test the effect of the coaching session, outpatient consultations were recorded roughly 1 month later. Pre and post-coaching videos were assessed using the Maastricht History-Taking and Advice Scoring - Global Rating List (MAAS), a common tool for evaluating non-technical skills in clinicians.
resultsA total of 12 surgeons consented to participate. Coaching significantly improved MAAS scores (mean difference = -0.61; 95% CI (-0.88, -0.33); P < 0.0001). Surgeons were generally positive about the experience. All found the method of learning suitable, and most thought the process improved their skills. Most thought that coaching would improve patient outcomes and the majority thought they would participate in ongoing coaching as part of their employment.
conclusionThis supports the concept of surgical coaching as an effective tool to improve communication skills and the quality of surgical consultation. The next step is to expand beyond a voluntary cohort and link surgical coaching to improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.