Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052759›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2022

'Pushing back': People newly diagnosed with dementia and their experiences of the Covid-19 pandemic restrictions in England.

Josie Dixon, Ben Hicks, Kate Gridley, Rotem Perach, Kate Baxter, Yvonne Birks, Carmen Colclough, Bryony Storey, Alice Russell, Anomita Karim and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Josie DixonCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4772-6450
Ben HicksBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6445-2415
Kate GridleySocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1488-4516
Rotem PerachSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8647-4367
Kate BaxterSocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.
Yvonne BirksSocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4235-5307
Carmen ColcloughSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2964-7740
Bryony StoreyGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4054-091X
Alice RussellBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Anomita KarimBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Eva TippingBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Sube BanerjeeFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8083-7649
DETERMIND team
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversity of York · GBUniversity of Sussex · GBGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesResearch into people with dementia's experiences of the Covid-19 pandemic has tended to focus on vulnerabilities and negative outcomes, with the risk of reproducing a discourse in which people with dementia are positioned as passive. Informed by concepts positioning people with dementia as 'active social agents', we aimed to identify the pandemic-related challenges faced by people recently diagnosed with dementia and examine the ways in which they actively coped with, and adapted to, these challenges. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsIn-depth interviews with 21 people recently diagnosed with dementia, recruited through an existing national cohort. Data was analysed thematically using Framework.

findingsKey challenges included reduced social contact, loneliness and loss of social routines; difficulties accessing and trusting health services; dementia-unfriendly practices; and disparate experiences of being able to 'get out' into the physical neighbourhood. People with dementia responded to challenges by maintaining and extending their social networks and making the most of 'nodding acquaintances'; learning new skills, for communication and hobbies; supporting others, engaging in reciprocal exchange and valuing connection with peers; seeking help and advocacy and challenging and resisting dementia-unfriendly practices; maintaining and adapting habitual spatial practices and being determined to 'get out'; and employing similar emotional coping strategies for the pandemic and dementia.

conclusionsSupport for people with dementia, especially during public health crises when carers and services are under pressure, should involve utilising existing capacities, appropriately supporting the acquisition of new knowledge and skills, 'safety-netting' through the availability of a named professional, advocacy and support and use of 'check-in calls' and creating supportive social and environmental circumstances for people with dementia to sustain their own well-being.

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaAdaptation, PsychologicalCaregiversHumansPandemicsactive social agentactive social citizenshipassets-basedautonomycopingCovid-19dementiapandemicstrengths-based

Identifiers

PMID36052759
PMCPMC9539182
OpenAlexW4292372639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.