ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2022
Retrospective Comparison of Outcomes Between Closed and Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Children Aged 6-24 Months.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic value of artificial intelligence-assisted imaging for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Late closed or open reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Long-leg spica casts demonstrate superior outcomes in developmental dysplasia of the hip: a multi-center retrospective analysis of failure risks and protective factors.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Risk factors for residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to compare the outcomes between closed reduction (CR) and open reduction (OR) in children aged 6-24 months with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) who could be reduced safely and stably by the closed reduction operation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 77 patients who underwent CR or OR for DDH. Fifty-one patients (56 hips) underwent CR, 26 (29 hips) underwent OR. The demographic data, International Hip Dysplasia Institute classification and acetabular index (AI) before reduction and the centre-edge angle (CEA), AI, Alsberg angle (AA), Reimer's migration index (RMI), and height-to-width index (HWI) of the epiphysis were compared between two groups at the final follow-up. The percentage of coxa magna > 15% of the normal side and AA > 81° were calculated. Results: At the final follow-up, the mean AA in the CR and OR groups were 77.66° (60°-89°) and 81.97° (73°-91°) ( Conclusion: In children aged 6-24 months with DDH, if a stable and safe CR can be obtained but with medial joint space up to 6mm, CR should be attempted first.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.