ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2022
Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomy Focusing on the Mid-substance Insertion and Fan-like Extension Fibers.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to review the anatomical reports concerning the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) focusing on the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers, or direct and indirect insertions. Methods: Following the PRISMA, data collection was performed. PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochran library were searched with the terms "anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction", "anatomy", and "cadaver". Studies were included when anatomical dissection of the ACL with cadavers was performed. Biomechanical studies without a detailed description of the anatomical dissection, reviews, and studies not including pictures of the anatomical specimens were excluded from this study. In the full article review, documentation of the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers, or direct and indirect insertions in the ACL morphology was evaluated in detail. Results: Fifty-seven studies were included for detailed evaluation. In 2006, Mochizuki et al. reported a macroscopic differentiation between the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers in the ACL footprint. In 2010, Iwahashi et al. detected the existence of direct and indirect insertions within the femoral ACL footprint, microscopically. Following Mochizuki's report, anatomical evaluation of the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers, or direct and indirect insertions was reported in 16 of 51 ACL anatomical studies. In studies focusing on the morphology of the ACL, 16 of 28 studies addressed this subject. In these studies, the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers were differentiated macroscopically, and the direct and indirect insertions were differentiated microscopically within the ACL footprint. Fan-like extension fibers or indirect insertion was reported to surround the mid-substance insertion or direct insertion within the femoral ACL footprint. Conclusions: The results of this systematic review showed that, the existence of the mid-substance insertion and fan-like extension fibers, or direct and indirect insertions in ACL morphology is being recognized more widely. These structures should be taken into consideration when surgeons perform ACL surgery. Level of Evidence: III. Systematic review of Level-III studies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00695-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.