ArticleStatistica Sinica2022
Prior Knowledge Guided Ultra-high Dimensional Variable Screening with Application to Neuroimaging Data.
Article in Statistica Sinica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Group Structure Guided Ultra-High Dimensional Feature Screening for Survival Outcome.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Bayesian nonparametric method for genetic dissection of brain activation region.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Variable screening is a powerful and efficient tool for dimension reduction under ultrahigh dimensional settings. However, most existing methods overlook useful prior knowledge in specific applications. In this work, from a Bayesian modeling perspective, we develop a unified variable screening procedure for the linear regression model. We discuss different constructions of posterior mean screening (PMS) statistics to incorporate different types of prior knowledge according to specific applications. With non-informative prior specifications, PMS is equivalent to high-dimensional ordinary least-square projections (HOLP). We establish the screening consistency property for PMS with different types of prior knowledge. We show that PMS is robust to prior misspecifications; and when the prior knowledge provides correct information on summarizing the true parameter settings, PMS can substantially improve the selection accuracy compared to HOLP and other existing methods. We illustrate our method with extensive simulation studies and an analysis of neuroimaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.