Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052338›Full record

ArticleStatistica Sinica2022

Prior Knowledge Guided Ultra-high Dimensional Variable Screening with Application to Neuroimaging Data.

Jie He, Jian Kang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistica Sinica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie HeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Jian KangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Funding

Statistical ICA Methods for Analysis & Integration of Multi-dimensional Data Diversity SupplementR01MH105561 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, KANG, JIAN · 2014 to 2024
$4.3M
New Statistical Methods for Modelling Cancer OutcomesR01CA249096 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Yi Li · 2021 to 2026
$2.5M
Scalable Bayesian methods for big imaging data analysisR01DA048993 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOHNSON, TIMOTHY D, KANG, JIAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
Bayesian Network Biomarker Selection in Metabolomics DataR01GM124061 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KANG, JIAN · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA249096NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048993NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124061NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variable screening is a powerful and efficient tool for dimension reduction under ultrahigh dimensional settings. However, most existing methods overlook useful prior knowledge in specific applications. In this work, from a Bayesian modeling perspective, we develop a unified variable screening procedure for the linear regression model. We discuss different constructions of posterior mean screening (PMS) statistics to incorporate different types of prior knowledge according to specific applications. With non-informative prior specifications, PMS is equivalent to high-dimensional ordinary least-square projections (HOLP). We establish the screening consistency property for PMS with different types of prior knowledge. We show that PMS is robust to prior misspecifications; and when the prior knowledge provides correct information on summarizing the true parameter settings, PMS can substantially improve the selection accuracy compared to HOLP and other existing methods. We illustrate our method with extensive simulation studies and an analysis of neuroimaging data.

Indexed as

Linear regressionPosterior mean screeningPrior knowledgeScreening consistency

Identifiers

PMID36052338
PMCPMC9426412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.