Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052311›Full record

ArticleInfection prevention in practice2022

Do patients need advice and information to prevent infections - results of a single centre structured survey.

M Voigt, R Schaumann, F Barre, E Mayr, W Lehmann, T Hawellek, H E J Kaba, S Wüstefeld, S Scheithauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M VoigtInstitute of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Göttingen, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany.
R SchaumannInstitute of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Göttingen, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany.
F BarreInstitute of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Göttingen, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany.
E MayrHealth Department for the City and the District of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
W LehmannClinic for Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medicine Göttingen, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany.
T HawellekClinic for Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medicine Göttingen, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany.
H E J KabaInstitute of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Göttingen, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany.
S WüstefeldInstitute of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Göttingen, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany.
S ScheithauerInstitute of Infection Control and Infectious Diseases, University Medicine Göttingen, Georg August University Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Healthcare-associated infections are a major burden for hospitals, leading to morbidity and mortality and unnecessary medical costs. They can probably be reduced through what is known as patient empowerment. This study aims to address the question of whether patients are interested in receiving infection prevention and control information. Methods: Patients were asked in structured interviews whether they would like more information on infection prevention and control. Inclusion criteria comprised 2 groups of patients. Group 1 were patients undergoing elective total endoprosthesis (TEP) and Group 2 were patients tested positive for meticillin-resistant Results: The response rate was 38.4 % (163/425 patients). Approximately 75 % of the patients were interested in information on infection prevention and control. The topics of interest differed between the two patient groups: MRSA patients had a higher need for infection prevention and control information. TEP patients showed a high acceptance of antiseptic body wash and a willingness to pay for it themselves. Information given to patients should be group-specific and timely. Conclusion: Our data suggest a lack of information on infection prevention and control among patients and underline the importance of patient empowerment. The willingness of patients to pay personally for antiseptic wash should be assessed further.

Indexed as

Healthcare-associated infectionInfection prevention and controlMRSAPatient empowermentSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID36052311
PMCPMC9424562
OpenAlexW4289316221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.