Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052264›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Multi-center verification of the influence of data ratio of training sets on test results of an AI system for detecting early gastric cancer based on the YOLO-v4 algorithm.

Tao Jin, Yancai Jiang, Boneng Mao, Xing Wang, Bo Lu, Ji Qian, Hutao Zhou, Tieliang Ma, Yefei Zhang, Sisi Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tao JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, China.
Yancai JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, China.
Boneng MaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, China.
Xing WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, China.
Bo LuMicrosoft Ltd Co., Suzhou, China.
Ji QianDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, China.
Hutao ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, China.
Tieliang MaDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, China.
Yefei ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Sisi LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Civil Aviation Hospital of Shanghai, A Branch of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Yun ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhendong YaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) is increasingly being applied in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. However, the impact of proportion of internal data in the training set on test results has not been sufficiently studied. Here, we constructed an artificial intelligence (AI) system called EGC-YOLOV4 using the YOLO-v4 algorithm to explore the optimal ratio of training set with the power to diagnose early gastric cancer. Design: A total of 22,0918 gastroscopic images from Yixing People's Hospital were collected. 7 training set models were established to identify 4 test sets. Respective sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, accuracy, and corresponding thresholds were tested, and ROC curves were plotted. Results: 1. The EGC-YOLOV4 system completes all tests at an average reading speed of about 15 ms/sheet; 2. The AUC values in training set 1 model were 0.8325, 0.8307, 0.8706, and 0.8279, in training set 2 model were 0.8674, 0.8635, 0.9056, and 0.9249, in training set 3 model were 0.8544, 0.8881, 0.9072, and 0.9237, in training set 4 model were 0.8271, 0.9020, 0.9102, and 0.9316, in training set 5 model were 0.8249, 0.8484, 0.8796, and 0.8931, in training set 6 model were 0.8235, 0.8539, 0.9002, and 0.9051, in training set 7 model were 0.7581, 0.8082, 0.8803, and 0.8763. Conclusion: EGC-YOLOV4 can quickly and accurately identify the early gastric cancer lesions in gastroscopic images, and has good generalization.The proportion of positive and negative samples in the training set will affect the overall diagnostic performance of AI.In this study, the optimal ratio of positive samples to negative samples in the training set is 1:1~ 1:2.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)convolutional neural network (CNN)early gastric cancer (EGC)ROCYOLOyouden index

Identifiers

PMID36052264
PMCPMC9425091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.