ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Autophagy-related prognostic signature characterizes tumor microenvironment and predicts response to ferroptosis in gastric cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipid Metabolism Reprogramming in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Mechanisms and Treatment Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Explore the role of CBS in stomach adenocarcinoma based on the sulfur-containing amino acid metabolism network.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Molecular signatures of disulfidptosis: interplay with programmed cell death pathways and therapeutic implications in oncology.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025Review
- Identification of fatty acid anabolism patterns to predict prognosis and immunotherapy response in gastric cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Potential mechanism of traditional Chinese medicine intervention in gastric cancer: targeted regulation of autophagy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Identification of an autophagy- and macropinocytosis-related prognostic signature for the prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response in gastric cancer.Genes & genomics · 2024Article
- Regulation of NCOA4-mediated iron recycling ameliorates paraquat-induced lung injury by inhibiting ferroptosis.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis identifies CLEC1B as a potential prognostic biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2023Article
- Development of a novel autophagy-related gene model for gastric cancer prognostic prediction.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is an important disease and the fifth most common malignancy worldwide. Autophagy is an important process for the turnover of intracellular substances. Autophagy-related genes (ARGs) are crucial in cancer. Accumulating evidence indicates the clinicopathological significance of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in predicting prognosis and treatment efficacy. Methods: Clinical and gene expression data of GC were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases. A total of 22 genes with differences in expression and prognosis were screened from 232 ARGs. Three autophagy patterns were identified using an unsupervised clustering algorithm and scored using principal component analysis to predict the value of autophagy in the prognosis of GC patients. Finally, the relationship between autophagy and ferroptosis was validated in gastric cancer cells. Results: The expression of ARGs showed obvious heterogeneity in GC patients. Three autophagy patterns were identified and used to predict the overall survival of GC patients. These three patterns were well-matched with the immunophenotype. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and Gene Ontology enrichment analyses showed that the biological functions of the three autophagy patterns were different. A scoring system was then set up to quantify the autophagy model and further evaluate the response of the patients to the immunotherapy. Patients with high autophagy scores had a more severe tumor mutation burden and better prognosis. High autophagy scores were accompanied by high microsatellite instability. Patients with high autophagy scores had significantly higher PD-L1 expression and increased survival. The experimental results confirmed that the expression of ferroptosis genes was positively correlated with the expression of autophagy genes in different autophagy clusters, and inhibition of autophagy dramatically reversed the decrease in ferroptotic cell death and lipid accumulation. Conclusions: Autophagy patterns are involved in TME diversity and complexity. Autophagy score can be used as an independent prognostic biomarker in GC patients and to predict the effect of immunotherapy and ferroptosis-based therapy. This might benefit individualized treatment for GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.