Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052200›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2022

Socioeconomic differences in informal caregiving in Europe.

Nekehia T Quashie, Melanie Wagner, Ellen Verbakel, Christian Deindl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perceptions on healthy aging: insights from focus group interviews of older adults in Sweden.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. When family caregiving happens: life-course timing and health outcomes in later life.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nekehia T QuashieDepartment of Social Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2654-1150
Melanie WagnerMax Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Munich, Germany.
Ellen VerbakelDepartment of Sociology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1022-9020
Christian DeindlDepartment of Social Sciences, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-0381

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disclosing socioeconomic differences in informal care provision is increasingly important in aging societies as it helps to identify the segments of the population that may need targeted support and the types of national investments to support family caregivers. This study examines the association between individual-level socioeconomic status and informal care provision within the household. We also examine the role of contextual factors, income inequality, and the generosity of social spending, to identify how macro-level socioeconomic resource structures shape individuals' provision of care to household members. We use pooled data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE, waves 1, 2, 4, 5, 6) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA, waves 2, 3, 4, 6, 7). Poisson regression multilevel models estimate the associations between household socioeconomic status (education, income, and wealth), and country socioeconomic resources (income inequality and social spending as a percentage of GDP), and the likelihood of older adults' informal care provision within the household. Results indicate that lower individual socioeconomic resources-education, income, and wealth-were associated with a higher incidence of older adults' informal care provision within the household. At the macro-level, income inequality was positively associated while social spending was negatively associated with older adults' care provision within the household. Our findings suggest that socioeconomically disadvantaged groups are more likely to provide informal care, which may reinforce socioeconomic inequalities. At the national level, more equitable resource distribution and social spending may reduce intensive family caregiving.

Indexed as

Cross-nationalEuropeInformal caregivingSocioeconomic inequality

Identifiers

PMID36052200
PMCPMC9424460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.