Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052193›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of ageing2022

What matters to people aged 80 and over regarding ambulatory care? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Angélique Herrler, Helena Kukla, Vera Vennedey, Stephanie Stock

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. My home is where my health is: narratives on health promotion from older people living at home.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angélique HerrlerFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School GROW, Gerontological Research on Well-being, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8551-5091
Helena KuklaFaculty of Human Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School GROW, Gerontological Research on Well-being, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4337-9666
Vera VennedeyInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4977-750X
Stephanie StockInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1726-9300
University Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing percentage of the population aged 80 and over is challenging for healthcare systems, as frailty and other complex health issues are common in this age group. In order to provide patient-centered ambulatory healthcare, their preferences and expectations need to be explored. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically search for and synthesize qualitative evidence on how people aged 80 and over believe ambulatory healthcare (medical and nursing care) should be delivered to them. Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar were searched for full research reports of qualitative studies focusing on the preferences, wishes, needs, expectations and experiences of people aged 80 and over regarding ambulatory medical and nursing care. The results were screened by two independent reviewers using a two-step approach. The included studies were meta-synthesized using Thomas and Harden's 'thematic synthesis' approach in order to gain a new, second-order interpretation of the findings of the primary studies. In the intermediate synthesis step, 14 aspects of healthcare structures and care relationships were identified as relevant. Based on these, three underlying wishes were found: feeling safe, feeling like a meaningful human being, and maintaining control and independence. The results of this review are in line with other research, such as reviews focusing on the preferences of the younger age group (65-80). However, the importance of aspects of care relationships as an integral part of favorable ambulatory healthcare and the wish to be strengthened as a meaningful human being are emphasized more strongly. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-021-00633-7.

Indexed as

80 and overAgedAmbulatory carePatient-centered carePatient preferencesQualitative researchSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36052193
PMCPMC9424416
OpenAlexW3196041246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.