Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052186›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2022

Why do men extend their employment beyond pensionable age more often than women? a cohort study.

Saana Myllyntausta, Marianna Virtanen, Jaana Pentti, Mika Kivimäki, Jussi Vahtera, Sari Stenholm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saana MyllyntaustaDepartment of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6503-3829
Marianna VirtanenSchool of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Psychology, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8361-3301
Jaana PenttiDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Mika KivimäkiClinicum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4699-5627
Jussi VahteraDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-061X
Sari StenholmDepartment of Public Health, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-0930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men extend their employment beyond pensionable age more often than women, but the factors that contribute to this sex difference are unknown. This study aimed to examine sex differences in extending employment and the contribution of sociodemographic, work- and health-related factors to these differences. Participants of this prospective cohort study were 4,263 public sector employees from Finland who reached their individual pensionable date between 2014 and 2019 and responded to a survey on work- and non-work-related issues before that date. Extended employment was defined as continuing working for over six months beyond the individual pensionable date. We used mediation analysis to examine the contribution of explanatory factors to the association between sex and extended employment. Of the participants, 29% extended employment beyond the pensionable date. Men had a 1.29-fold (95% confidence interval 1.11-1.49) higher probability of extending employment compared with women. Men had a higher prevalence of factors that increase the likelihood of extended employment than women (such as spouse working full-time, no part-time retirement, low job strain, high work time control, and lack of pain) and this mediated the association of sex with extended employment by up to 83%. In conclusion, men were more likely to extend their employment beyond pensionable age than women. This difference was largely explained by men being more likely to have a full-time working spouse, low job strain, high work time control, no pain, and not being on part-time retirement. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10433-021-00663-1.

Indexed as

AgingMediation analysisPostponing retirementSex differencesWork characteristics

Identifiers

PMID36052186
PMCPMC9424425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.