Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052166›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Dynamic recognition of naloxone, morphine and endomorphin1 in the same pocket of µ-opioid receptors.

Xin Zhang, Meng-Yang Sun, Xue Zhang, Chang-Run Guo, Yun-Tao Lei, Wen-Hui Wang, Ying-Zhe Fan, Peng Cao, Chang-Zhu Li, Rui Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mechanistic insights into ligand selectivity inActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A shared mechanism for TNP-ATP recognition by members of the P2X receptor family.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Xin ZhangDepartment of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy and State Key laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Meng-Yang SunDepartment of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy and State Key laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Xue ZhangDepartment of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy and State Key laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Chang-Run GuoDepartment of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy and State Key laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Yun-Tao LeiDepartment of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy and State Key laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Wen-Hui WangDepartment of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy and State Key laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Ying-Zhe FanPutuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Chinese Traditional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Peng CaoHospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Chang-Zhu LiState Key Laboratory of Utilization of Woody Oil Resource, Hunan Academy of Forestry, Changsha, China.
Rui WangKey Laboratory of Preclinical Study for New Drugs of Gansu Province, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Xing-Hua LiDepartment of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy and State Key laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Ye YuDepartment of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy and State Key laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
Xiao-Na YangDepartment of Basic Medicine and Clinical Pharmacy and State Key laboratory of Natural Medicines, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China.
China Pharmaceutical University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNLanzhou University · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphine, the most widely used analgesic, relieves severe pain by activating the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), whereas naloxone, with only slight structural changes compared to morphine, exhibits inhibitory effect, and is used to treat opioid abuse. The mechanism by which the MOR distinguishes between the two is unclear. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on a 1-μs time scale and metadynamics-enhanced conformational sampling are used here to determine the different interactions of these two ligands with MOR: morphine adjusted its pose by continuously flipping deeper into the pocket, whereas naloxone failed to penetrate deeper because its allyl group conflicts with several residues of MOR. The endogenous peptide ligand endomorphin-1 (EM-1) underwent almost no significant conformational changes during the MD simulations. To validate these processes, we employed GIRK4

Indexed as

endomorphin 1ion channelmorphinenaloxoneμ-opioid receptors

Identifiers

PMID36052166
PMCPMC9424762
OpenAlexW4292193089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.