Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052139›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Effect of indobufen vs. aspirin on platelet accumulation in patients with stable coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: An open-label crossover study.

Qiu-Ping Shi, Xing-Yu Luo, Bin Zhang, Xin-Gang Wang, Jing Zhao, Qiu-Fen Xie, Jia-Hui Liu, Yao-Kun Liu, Jie Jiang, Bo Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Indobufen Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Versus Aspirin Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Efficacy and Safety of Indobufen in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Comparison of the Effects of Indobufen and Aspirin in Older Patients with Coronary Artery Disease After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qiu-Ping ShiPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xing-Yu LuoPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bin ZhangPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin-Gang WangPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing ZhaoPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiu-Fen XiePeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jia-Hui LiuPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yao-Kun LiuPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie JiangPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bo ZhengPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

antiplatelet therapycoronary heart diseaseindobufenpercutaneous coronary interventionplatelet aggregation rate

Identifiers

PMID36052139
PMCPMC9424757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.