ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022
Predictive value of drug efficacy by M6A modification patterns in rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- mFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Recent advances of m6A methylation in skeletal system disease.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Ferroptosis-Related Molecular Clusters and Diagnostic Model in Rheumatoid Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comprehensive analysis of m6A RNA methylation modification patterns and the immune microenvironment in osteoarthritis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis is a highly heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by unpredictable disease flares and significant differences in therapeutic response to available treatments. One possible reason for poor efficacy is that it cannot be treated accurately due to no optimal stratification for RA patients. Objective: This study aims to construct an RA classification model by m6A characters and further predict response to medication. Methods: Twenty m6A regulators were used to construct a random forest diagnosis model, and RNA-seq analysis was employed for external validation. The RNA modification patterns mediated by 20 m6A regulators were systematically evaluated in 1191 RA samples and explored different molecular clusters associated with other immune microenvironment characteristics and biological pathways. Then, we established an m6A score model to quantify the m6A modification patterns. The model was applied to patients at baseline to test the association between m6Ascore and infliximab responsiveness. Results: The m6A diagnosis model showed good discriminatory ability in distinguishing RA. Patients with RA were classified into three clusters with distinct molecular and cellular signatures. Cluster A displayed strongly activated inflammatory cells and pathways. Specific innate lymphocytes occupied cluster B. Cluster C was mainly enriched in prominent adaptive lymphocytes and NK-mediated cytotoxicity signatures with the highest m6A score. Patients with a low m6Ascore exhibited significantly infliximab therapeutic benefits compared with those with a high m6Ascore (p< 0.05). Conclusion: Our study is the first to provide a comprehensive analysis of m6A modifications in RA, which provides an innovative patient stratification framework and potentially enables improved therapeutic decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.