SynthesisContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Meta-Analysis of Anesthetic Efficacy and Safety of Propofol in Craniotomy Patients.
Synthesis in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).BMC anesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2024Review
- Retracted: Meta-Analysis of Anesthetic Efficacy and Safety of Propofol in Craniotomy Patients.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-27Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/244F66C1DA64D17D77A42351EEF9F4
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The anesthetic effect and safety of propofol in craniotomy patients by meta-analysis is investigated. Relevant studies consistent with the anesthetic effect and safety of propofol in craniotomy patients are searched and screened from domestic and foreign literature databases such as Wanfang Medical Center, CNKI, VIP, and PubMed, and meta-analysis is performed by RevMan 5.2 software. Experimental results show that the recovery time, intracranial pressure, cerebral edema, partial cerebral oxygen pressure, glutamate, and MDA in the propofol group are better than those in the control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.