Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051897›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2022

Differentiating Gender and Sex in Dental Research: A Narrative Review.

Alice Alberti, Benedetta Morandi, Luca Francetti, Silvio Taschieri, Stefano Corbella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alice AlbertiDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5017-1340
Benedetta MorandiDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4078-2233
Luca FrancettiDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5775-8961
Silvio TaschieriDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7866-5024
Stefano CorbellaDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, Università Degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8428-8811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While in humans the term "sex" refers to the biological attributes that distinguish subjects as male, female, and intersex, the term "gender" refers to psychological, social, and cultural factors that strongly influence attitudes, behaviors, and relationships of individuals. Recently, it has been emphasized how the integration of these two terms in the design of the research can improve the methodology of the research itself. However, in dental research, the influence of gender has not gained enough consideration and it is often used indiscriminately as a synonym for sex. This narrative review discusses the usefulness of considering gender and sex in dental research, whose guidelines have been provided so far on this topic, and whether the top 20 dental scientific journals promote the analysis of sex and gender in their guidelines. Sex and gender analysis in dental research could be important both for analyzing biological differences such as those in the immune or neuro-immune system, cardiovascular physiology, developmental anomalies or deformities, and psychosocial differences such as lifestyle, pain experience and prevalence of chronic pain, eating behavior, and access to healthcare services. As for the specific policies for sex and gender analysis and reporting, only five out of 20 biomedical journals have included them in their editorial policy, which refers mainly to the correct use of the terms "sex" and "gender." In conclusion, we found that no specific and differentiated sex and gender analysis and reporting are required in dental journals. Their integration, which is still not routinely applied, may be improved in the future by updating editorial guidelines and developing more specific methodological recommendations.

Identifiers

PMID36051897
PMCPMC9427264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.