Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051870›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2022

MLACP 2.0: An updated machine learning tool for anticancer peptide prediction.

Le Thi Phan, Hyun Woo Park, Thejkiran Pitti, Thirumurthy Madhavan, Young-Jun Jeon, Balachandran Manavalan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. CancerPPD2: an updated repository of anticancer peptides and proteins.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Le Thi PhanComputational Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Integrative Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Woo ParkDepartment of Integrative Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Thejkiran PittiComputational Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Integrative Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Thirumurthy MadhavanComputational Biology Lab, Department of Genetic Engineering, SRM Institute of Science & Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, Tamil Nadu, India.
Young-Jun JeonDepartment of Integrative Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Balachandran ManavalanComputational Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Integrative Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Sungkyunkwan University · KRSRM Institute of Science and Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticancer peptides are emerging anticancer drug that offers fewer side effects and is more effective than chemotherapy and targeted therapy. Predicting anticancer peptides from sequence information is one of the most challenging tasks in immunoinformatics. In the past ten years, machine learning-based approaches have been proposed for identifying ACP activity from peptide sequences. These methods include our previous method MLACP (developed in 2017) which made a significant impact on anticancer research. MLACP tool has been widely used by the research community, however, its robustness must be improved significantly for its continued practical application. In this study, the first large non-redundant training and independent datasets were constructed for ACP research. Using the training dataset, the study explored a wide range of feature encodings and developed their respective models using seven different conventional classifiers. Subsequently, a subset of encoding-based models was selected for each classifier based on their performance, whose predicted scores were concatenated and trained through a convolutional neural network (CNN), whose corresponding predictor is named MLACP 2.0. The evaluation of MLACP 2.0 with a very diverse independent dataset showed excellent performance and significantly outperformed the recent ACP prediction tools. Additionally, MLACP 2.0 exhibits superior performance during cross-validation and independent assessment when compared to CNN-based embedding models and conventional single models. Consequently, we anticipate that our proposed MLACP 2.0 will facilitate the design of hypothesis-driven experiments by making it easier to discover novel ACPs. The MLACP 2.0 is freely available at https://balalab-skku.org/mlacp2.

Indexed as

Anticancer peptidesBaseline modelsConventional classifiersConvolutional neural networkDataset constructionFeature encodings

Identifiers

PMID36051870
PMCPMC9421197
OpenAlexW4289525677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.