Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051746›Full record

ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2022

Fabrication and in vivo 2-photon microscopy validation of transparent PEDOT:PSS microelectrode arrays.

Gerwin Dijk, Attila Kaszas, Jolien Pas, Rodney Philip O'Connor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Towards maximizing optical access through Smart Dura.Journal of neural engineering · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. PEDOT:PSS-A Key Material for Bioelectronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In vivo microelectrode arrays for neuroscience.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gerwin DijkMines Saint-Etienne, Centre CMP, Department of Bioelectronics, Gardanne, 13541 France.
Attila KaszasMines Saint-Etienne, Centre CMP, Department of Bioelectronics, Gardanne, 13541 France.ORCID 0000-0002-2019-3722
Jolien PasPanaxium SAS, Aix-en-Provence, 13100 France.
Rodney Philip O'ConnorMines Saint-Etienne, Centre CMP, Department of Bioelectronics, Gardanne, 13541 France.
Mines Saint-Étienne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transparent microelectrode arrays enable simultaneous electrical recording and optical imaging of neuronal networks in the brain. Electrodes made of the conducting polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) are transparent; however, device fabrication necessitates specific processes to avoid deterioration of the organic material. Here, we present an innovative fabrication scheme for a neural probe that consists of transparent PEDOT:PSS electrodes and demonstrate its compatibility with 2-photon microscopy. The electrodes show suitable impedance to record local field potentials from the cortex of mice and sufficient transparency to visualize GCaMP6f-expressing neurons underneath the PEDOT:PSS features. The results validate the performance of the neural probe, which paves the way to study the complex dynamics of in vivo neuronal activity with both a high spatial and temporal resolution to better understand the brain.

Indexed as

EngineeringMaterials science

Identifiers

PMID36051746
PMCPMC9424218
OpenAlexW4293796941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.