Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051671›Full record

ArticleStatistics and its interface2022

When to initiate cancer screening exam?

Dongfeng Wu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics and its interface, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dongfeng WuDepartment of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville.
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Dynamic scheduling of the upcoming screening exam based on screening history and other parametersR15CA242482 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI WU, DONGFENG · 2019 to 2019
$435k
NCI NIH HHS R15 CA242482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A probability method is developed to decide when to initiate cancer screening for asymptomatic individuals. The probability of incidence is a function of screening sensitivity, time duration in the disease-free state and sojourn time in the preclinical state; and it is monotonically increasing as time increases, given a person's current age. So a unique solution of the first screening time can be found by limiting this probability to a small value, such as 10% or 20%. That is, with 90% or 80% probability, one will not be a clinical incident case before the first exam. After this age is found, we can further estimate the lead time distribution and probability of over-diagnosis if one would be diagnosed with cancer at the first exam. Simulations were carried out under different scenarios; and the method was applied to two heavy smoker cohorts in the National Lung Screening Trial using low-dose computerized tomography. The method is applicable to other kinds of cancer screening. The predictive information can be used by physicians or individuals at risk to make informed decisions on when to initiate screening.

Indexed as

Lead timeOverdiagnosisSchedulingSensitivitySojourn timeTransition density

Identifiers

PMID36051671
PMCPMC9432459
OpenAlexW4214888610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.