Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051645›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Head holder and cranial window design for sequential magnetic resonance imaging and optical imaging in awake mice.

Signe H Mikkelsen, Boris Wied, Vitalii Dashkovskyi, Thomas Beck Lindhardt, Lydiane Hirschler, Jan M Warnking, Emmanuel L Barbier, Dmitry Postnov, Brian Hansen, Eugenio Gutiérrez-Jiménez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Preclinical in-vivo cerebrovascular imaging in rodent models: Methods and applications in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Laser speckle imaging of the hippocampus.Biomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Signe H MikkelsenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Boris WiedCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Vitalii DashkovskyiCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas Beck LindhardtCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lydiane HirschlerLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jan M WarnkingUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, GIN, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, La Tronche, France.
Emmanuel L BarbierUniv. Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, GIN, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences, La Tronche, France.
Dmitry PostnovCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Brian HansenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Eugenio Gutiérrez-JiménezCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging techniques are widely used in preclinical research as diagnostic tools to detect physiological abnormalities and assess the progression of neurovascular disease in animal models. Despite the wealth of imaging options in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), interpretation of imaging-derived parameters regarding underlying tissue properties is difficult due to technical limitations or lack of parameter specificity. To address the challenge of interpretation, we present an animal preparation protocol to achieve quantitative measures from both MRI and advanced optical techniques, including laser speckle contrast imaging and two-photon microscopy, in murine models. In this manner, non-translatable methods support and improve interpretation of less specific, translatable methods, i.e., MRI. Combining modalities for improved clinical interpretation involves satisfying the requirements of various methods. Furthermore, physiology unperturbed by anesthetics is a prerequisite for the strategy to succeed. Awake animal imaging with restraint provides an alternative to anesthesia and facilitates translatability of cerebral measurements. The method outlines design requirements for the setup and a corresponding reproducible surgical procedure for implanting a 3D printed head holder and cranial window to enable repeated multimodal imaging. We document the development, application, and validation of the method and provide examples confirming the usefulness of the design in acquiring high quality data from multiple modalities for quantification of a wide range of metrics of cerebral physiology in the same animal. The method contributes to preclinical small animal imaging, enabling sequential imaging of previously mutually exclusive techniques.

Indexed as

awake imagingcranial windowinterpretationmultimodalityrestraint designsurgical protocol

Identifiers

PMID36051645
PMCPMC9425635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.