Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36051628›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice2021

Exploring Individual Differences as Predictors of Performance Change During Dual-N-Back Training.

Per T Ørskov, Anne Norup, Erin L Beatty, Susanne M Jaeggi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Editorial: Five Years of Journal of Cognitive Enhancement.Journal of cognitive enhancement : towards the integration of theory and practice · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Per T ØrskovDepartment of Language and Communication, Faculty of Humanities, University of Southern Denmark, Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2077-4092
Anne NorupDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5598-6116
Erin L BeattyDepartment of Language and Communication, Faculty of Humanities, University of Southern Denmark, Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9280-6359
Susanne M JaeggiSchool of Education, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6165-2526

Funding

Cognitive Training and Brain Plasticity - Towards an Understanding of Mediators and ModeratorsK02AG054665 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI JAEGGI, SUSANNE M · 2017 to 2021
$806k
NIA NIH HHS K02 AG054665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In working memory training studies, individual trajectories are known to vary considerably between participants. A better understanding of how individual differences affect training outcomes is important because it might inform the development of more effective training interventions. This study explored how measures of working memory, intelligence, sustained attention, training motivation, mindset, psychological well-being, perceived stress, and sleep quality affect initial training performance and rate of change. A total of 217 upper secondary students completed 12 weeks of adaptive dual-n-back in a classroom setting. We analyzed their self-reported training data using latent growth curve modeling. We found that working memory and intelligence predicted both, initial training performance and rate of performance change. Sustained attention and sleep quality predicted initial performance, but not the rate of change. Furthermore, we observed that participants who completed the intervention scored significantly higher on measures of working memory and intelligence and reported lower levels of perceived stress and higher levels of sleep quality at baseline compared to dropouts. In general, our study supports the magnification account with higher ability individuals starting out at a higher performance level and showing a higher rate of performance change, and moreover, being more likely to adhere to the training protocol.

Indexed as

Cognitive trainingIndividual differencesIntelligenceLatent growth curve modelingMagnification accountWorking memoryWorking memory training

Identifiers

PMID36051628
PMCPMC9431390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.