ArticleWorld journal of psychiatry2022
Believing processes during the COVID-19 pandemic in individuals with bipolar disorder: An exploratory study.
Article in World journal of psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between biological rhythm disturbances and suicidal ideation in mood disorders: A cross-sectional study in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Believing Processes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Believing processes around COVID-19 vaccination: An exploratory study investigating workers in the health sector.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Pathways and crossroads to creditions: Insights from a retrospective view.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- COVID-19 vaccination motivation and underlying believing processes: A comparison study between individuals with affective disorder and healthy controls.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBelieving or "credition" refers to psychological processes that integrate the cognitions and emotions that influence our behavior. In the credition model by Angel and Seitz, four parameters are postulated: proposition, certainty, emotion and mightiness. It is assumed that believing processes are influenced by both the individual as well as socio-cultural factors and external circumstances. External or environmental circumstances can include threatening situations such as the ongoing pandemic. It has been hypothesized that believing processes related to the pandemic differ between individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) and healthy controls (HC).
aimTo investigate credition in individuals with BD during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
methodsPsychiatrically stable individuals with BD (
resultsIndividuals with BD reported significantly more negative propositions [
conclusionBelieving parameters were associated with psychiatric symptoms in BD during the pandemic. Findings broaden knowledge about the susceptibility of believing processes for ambient challenges in individuals with BD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.